where do we get the money? let us think ahead

USEFUL THOUGHTS FROM JIM DEARSLY OF WHITBY

Further to my previous email.

Robert asks who will pay for future parking?

Predictions of future population for Porirua do not indicate rapid growth. Is there a great demand for more parking? I have never had a problem with parking. However, if there is growth, then rates will increase and perhaps additional car parking can be funded from that increase in the rating base. Adequate parking will do more for the economic development of the city than the S&EC and would be an appropriate use of some of the money currently raised from the business sector. This would have been a far more appropriate use of the $5M received from the sale of the Aotea Block Parking fees are just another imposition on residents and ratepayers and merely another way of raising money for council to spend. Charging for parking will discourage cars and adversely affect parking - Ask businesses in Wellington. If new parking spaces are required, why wasn't this expenditure shown in the 10 year LTCCP? Was it so we woundn't be frightened off the S&EC???
Regards Jim

ROBERT COMMENTS

This buiding below, just completed, is owned by a council and operated by a private company. Cost: $8 million. In our case the building might provide both commuter parking and shopper parking. Hence, it would be located between the railway station and the shops. The bus terminal would be integrated with it. Let us all plan ahead for once.

one percent

I notice in the report from Transit NZ on progress regarding Transmission Gully that they have completed 1% of the planning and 0% of the construction. I wonder why I read the Land Transport Committee papers sometimes. The mayor is our Porirua City representative there.
r
Saturday, July 28, 2007

whitby village plan

There will be a series of house meetings held in Whitby to advance the village plan.

Lovely picture of the Whitby Lake

From the WRA meeting in May 2007 came the following suggestions for the issues and topics we should concentrate on in the Whitby Village Plan:

* Youth

* Educational facilities

* Recreation, eg Pool and facilities for older people

* Public transport

* Shops/shopping

* Walkways

* Limits on further housing and look at more varied housing types esp high density cheaper types

* Different types of business

* Effects of global warming especially on Inlet

* Self sufficiency in energy- generating our own ?

* Traffic esp SH58 and connections to Transmission Gully

* Traffic management systems in Whitby

* Reserves and play facilities

parking costs - start of debate

climate change - nelson council

titahi bay from papakowhai

The picture above was taken by Paul Moss a Papakowhai resident. It shows the Planet Venus (evidently above John Watson's house) and the tallest tower in New Zealand. For more pictures go to http://www.gadot.wellington.net.nz/sky/skylines.htm

submission on police act

AD/12/5
Stuart Parkinson
sparkinson@pcc.govt.nz
237 1610
27 July 2007
Police Act Review
Police National Headquarters
PO Box 3017
WELLINGTON

Dear Sir/Madam

REVIEW OF POLICE ACT 1958
The Porirua City Council is pleased to have the opportunity to make a submission on the Review of the Police Act 1958 set out in the consultation document Policing Directions in New Zealand for the 21st Century.

Porirua City Council fully supports the review of the Police Act 1958 and this submission covers several basic matters of importance to our City in relation to policing and safety.  We acknowledge that you will receive a range of responses from local government throughout the country and from Local Government New Zealand.

Local government mandate
The purpose of local government as set out in s10 of the Local Government Act 2002 is:
a) to enable democratic local decision-making and action by, and on behalf of, communities; and
b) to promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities, in the present and in the future.

In addition, s91 and s92 of the Local Government Act requires the identification of community outcomes for the intermediate and long-term future and to report on progress toward the outcomes.  Community outcomes are the broad aspirational goals the community selects as being important and these can and do span many issues and groups beyond the direct responsibility of local government.

Although community outcomes are inter-related and benefit from being viewed as a whole, the relevant community outcome and associated indicator in relation to law and order in Porirua is:

The broad mandate for local government means there is an opportunity to identify and take up issues of importance to our communities.  Apart from areas of direct responsibility, the most practical response is to advocate on behalf of our community and work collaboratively with other sectors and agencies with specific mandates.  In this case, Council views our relationship with the Police as an essential component of the City’s governance and wellbeing.

Police relationships and priority setting
Council recognises that the Police are an essential part of our community, particularly in ensuring a sense of safety and security.  We also recognise that community safety and the contributing factors and responses to crime rely on a growing network of processes and agencies.  Just like the health sector, safety and crime prevention needs a coordinated, multi-sector/multi-agency response.

Council enjoys a good relationship with local Police.  Kapiti Mana Area Commander Inspector John Spence is a member of several Council and community groups.  We recognise that in the absence of a legislative requirement for Police to consult and collaborate, there is a heavy reliance on goodwill and the strength of personal relationships.

Effective stakeholder communication by the Police, particularly with the public, is essential.  Porirua has a diverse population (especially ethnically diverse) and a variety of communication forms are required.  Apart from appropriate forms of communication, a ‘no surprises’ approach is sought in the event of new Police processes or technologies being introduced.  The recent introduction of tasers in the Police armoury resulted in a deputation of Pacific church ministers to Council concerned with both the implications of taser use and lack of community consultation.

Local government has a legal requirement to plan, set priorities, collaborate and consult as set out in the Local Government Act 2002.  Council supports a similar process for Police being included in the proposed Bill.  This would help to set out core Police responsibilities, identify local priorities supplemented with local and regional data and how these priorities will be responded to, and define boundaries and relationships with other local agencies.  It would also be important for Police to share the relevant community outcomes of the respective local authorities.

Information and boundaries
As described above, local government is also required to report on progress toward community outcomes and we draw on information (statistics and programme descriptions) provided by Police.  One of the challenges of reporting meaningfully on local safety and crime statistics is to obtain accurate and timely data on our City.

Porirua comes within the Kapiti-Mana Police District involving several local authorities and the data does not always lend itself to the crisp level of reporting we require for our City.  A realignment of Police district and local authority boundaries has been suggested previously but does not appear to have been addressed in the consultation document.  A similar approach has been taken with health districts overseen by District Health Boards (DHB) and health information is often reported at local authority level and then aggregated to DHB level.  Whether a similar approach is to be considered for Police districts is not clear and while Council does not have a strong view on this, we are keen to:

World Health Organization Safer City accreditation
One of the key partnerships for safety and injury prevention in Porirua has been formalised through Porirua’s application for Safer City accreditation with the World Health Organization.  The WHO Safe Communities model creates an infrastructure in local communities for addressing safety through building local partnerships.

As part of this process, a multi-agency Memorandum of Understanding was signed in March 2007 setting out the commitments by each agency toward a Safer Porirua.  Kapiti Mana Police are an essential part of the Committee overseeing the accreditation process which also includes: Council, Porirua Community Guardians, Accident Compensation Corporation, Regional Public Health and the Porirua Healthy Safer City Trust.

The Porirua Healthy Safer City Trust is the legal umbrella for the WHO Accreditation Safe Communities process.  The Trust, which has had close links with the Police for many years, aims to provide a safe and healthy environment and on the safety side, facilitates community responses to specific crime concerns such as graffiti and vandalism, car crime, violence and safer streets.  Council also contracts the Trust to undertake crime prevention work funded by the Government Crime Prevention Unit.

Community involvement in policing
Porirua Community Guardians was established in 2003 and funded by Council for the first time in 2004.  They have a strong relationship with Council and, as a distinct community patrolling group, are an invaluable organisation to community crime prevention and safer city activities.  It has strong support from the Police and other key organisations.  The Guardians promote community safety with a highly visible ambassadorial presence throughout the City.  Council supports such organisations being able to continue to have a role in our community.

Porirua City Council’s Strategic Coordination Group
The Strategic Coordination Group is an intersectoral liaison and network group with a specific focus on Porirua and is attended by the Police’s Kapiti-Mana Area Commander.  The Group includes government agencies with a direct funding, policy, planning and programme delivery role and helps to make connections across areas of responsibility.  Youth offending and youth justice issues are current issues being addressed in the Group.

Police Act Review specifics
Council appreciates the opportunity the community had to hear about and discuss the Police Act Review on 3 July 2007.  Council is aware that other groups such as the Porirua Healthy Safer City Trust will make separate submissions.  In response to the review and the Overview of issues for consultation (pgs 74-75 of consultation document), we make the following comments.

Principles – Council supports a new Policing Act establishing principles to help guide how policing is carried out in New Zealand, along the lines of suggested principles set out in the consultation document.

Effective Policing – Council supports the legislative proposals to support effective policing, along the lines set out in the consultation document.

People - Council supports the legislative proposals to modernise Police’s employing environment, along the lines set out in the consultation document.

Platforms - Council supports the legislative proposals for the governance and administration of Police, along the lines set out in the consultation document.

The Future –Council supports the drafting of a new Policing Act.  There is value in the Act being written in a way that allows the use of new technologies to prevent and solve crime but also the ability to respond effectively to new technologies used to commit crime.

Council will consider the opportunity to make a submission on the proposed Bill and looks forward to continuing the co-operative relationship it has enjoyed with the Police in our City.

This submission is lodged under delegation by the Chief Executive and will subsequently be reported to Council.  If you have any queries regarding the submission, please contact Stuart Parkinson, Senior Policy Analyst on 237 1610 (email: sparkinson@pcc.govt.nz).

Yours faithfully
Roger Blakeley
CHIEF EXECUTIVE

parking - an old issue - your thoughts most welcome

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Car parking in Porirua's central business district

The Porirua Council may establish further car parks in the city centre and charge for parking. Officers advice on such issues will be considered at the City Services Committee on 2 August.

Recently completed research suggests decisions are needed to provide for the growth of the city centre and that this should be done now as the Council works on the City Center revitalization plan.

City Services Committee Chairperson Robert Shaw said 94% of shoppers found parking in Porirua convenient. "That is a good situation for retailers and shoppers alike", he said.

However, the survey also indicated the need for better provision for those who work in the area and need long-term car-parking.

Cr Shaw said "It is is the advice of officers that the Council should consider a charge for day-parking. This might be about $5 a day and could be introduced along with better controls on the short-stay car parks."

"Some level of user-pays would assist the Council to raise money for further car park facilities. As far as we can, we wish to avoid car parking being a charge upon the general ratepayer. Porirua's rates are already too high and it looks likely that the Council will sooner or later have to purchase some  floors of parking in a building.

An associated issue is the safety of the car parks. Cr Shaw said he strongly supported the provision of more CCTV cameras along with improved lighting. We need to use the technology to secure the inner city. Already some progress has been made on this, but there is more work to be done.

Cr Shaw said he would move a motion at the Committee to consult the public before any decisions were taken. The work relates to amendments to the District Plan which is a high priority for many people, he added.
ends

red ken - turning blue

Dominion Post report:

Ken Douglas - the unionist once known as "Red Ken" - has abandoned the Labour Party to run as an independent at the upcoming local body elections.

Mr Douglas, a Porirua city councillor, withdrew his request to run on the Labour ticket after being dumped as a party candidate - along with fellow city councillor Litea Ah Hoi and former mayor John Burke - for the Porirua Community Trust.

Mr Douglas has indicated dissatisfaction with some of the candidates selected by Labour as another reason why he will run as an independent. "(But) I am not going to get into reasons, or the details, of the individuals concerned."

The three sitting trustees have been replaced on the Labour ticket for the trust elections by former city councillor Bud Lavery and present councillors David Stanley and Taima Fagaloa.

Mr Douglas will stand as an independent in the western ward at the October 13 elections, where he will face off against Labour candidates Henry Smith and Mr Lavery, a former Porirua Licensing Trust president.

He will also stand as an independent for the Porirua Community Trust.

A life-long unionist, Mr Douglas was founder of the Moscow-aligned Socialist Union Party, a secretary of the Federation of Labour, and foundation president of the Council of Trade Unions. He received the country's highest honour, the Order of New Zealand, in 1998.

He has been a member of Porirua City Council since 1998 - representing Labour after joining the party in time for the 2004 local body elections - and has been on the Porirua Licensing Trust since 2001.

He was elected to the Capital and Coast District Health Board in 2004, and is on numerous other boards, including those of Air New Zealand, New Zealand Post and the New Zealand Rugby Union. "

politics

LITEA TO KEN

How about you concentrate on your conflicts of interest on the ccdhb and other organisations, and leave the mayor to ask questions for the city. litea

----- Original Message ----- From: Marilyn Tucker To: Diane Koha - PCC ; Euon Murrell ; euonm@gilliesandmark.co.nz ; john.green@paradise.net.nz ; litea.mufasa@xtra.co.nz ; liz@kellyhygiene.co.nz ; Maureen Gillon (Home) ; Maureen Gillon (Work) ; naureenp@familystart-porirua.org.nz ; Rob Rangi ; robert@porirua.net ; suedow@paradise.net.nz ; t.fagaloa@whitireia.ac.nz ; twaters@paradise.net.nz Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 8:39 PM

Subject: Re: Media Release: PCC Concerned about outsourcing proposals for Ken epuru A&M Kia ora Jenny, You media release is entirely inappropriate especially having been invited to Chair a public meeting organised by the CCDHB for the purpose of reporting on the back ground and process associated with improved community delivery of health across our region. It is clear that you are attempting to grand stand on these extremely important issues. It behoves persons in positions such so having been approached by CCDHB to act as the meeting Chair person . The fact that you did not DESPITE having agreed to be the Chair is reprehensible. That is not acceptable and you do not have my support at all.
Ken Douglas

ROBERT COMMENTS

I have asked the ceo about the mayor's media statement. It is a use of council resources to promote her views and not those of the council itself. The Auditor General has just released a satement about such things in advance of the election. In fact, Jenny has the wrong end of the stick as any Keni watcher knows, and as was set out on this blog earlier.
r

city centre - a serious discussion

ROBERT COMMENTS

Earlier this week I met with Council ceo and Russell Black,

to consider Russell's ideas on the city. His ideas are around the foundational framework for the development of the city centre. This he sees as being based on three key nodes that need high visibility. His ideas reinforce and extend the thinking in the current report and hark back to the previous report. In addition he develops the idea of the underground car park in Cobham Court and the flow up over Titahi Bay Road.

Below are some different ideas from Whitby. These community inputs are important for the current debate is serious. We cannot afford to make mistakes in town planning. They are expensive in many ways and we have some direct experience.
r
Tuesday, July 24, 2007

By Jim Dearsly on behalf of the WRA

The presentation by Kobus last month was more or less the same as the previous one a few months ago. The only difference was that he down played the bleak 14m high featureless exterior of the S&EC. In the previous presentation he had made some proposals for hiding this behind some boutique shops and tree lined outside walkway and paved area. He has obviously been told this is not acceptable by Council. He did mention that this blank wall was a difficult feature to deal with (that is saying the least!). We support the idea of a plan so that some of the absurdities of previous ad hoc developments and consents are not repeated. However some of the detail needs more consideration and rationalisation.The beautification of streets with trees etc would green-up and soften the area. Much of that can be done without major re-planning of the street connections .Opening up the current pedestrian precinct to the traffic, however pedestrian friendly is questioned and should not be encroached on unless it can be shown there is real benefit. Two more vehicle accesses into the central parking square might well lead to vehicle congestion as it turns the central car park into what will become, in effect, a giant roundabout. There are already hold ups as vehicles wait for parks to clear or allow traffic in or out of parking spaces. Parallel parking involving people backing into parks will merely add to the congestion and it is hard to see how it can create more parking spaces.The only areas where parking is required close to shops is in relation to super markets as that is where people regularly purchase heavy (trolley loads) of goods. Most heavy items are purchased from the Plaza or the Mega Centre. Most people, when shopping in the central area, will park under New World, the City Plaza, in front of the Stationery Warehouse area, or in the square. I could argue that park and walk are good for us all. Having moving traffic in what is currently a pedestrian domain would not be a benefit and would in fact be an inconvenience and a hazard and as distracted pedestrians played “chicken” with distracted drivers. We should take note of what has happened in Wellington. Separating pedestrians from traffic used to be a planning policy. Has some new theory been formed?Porirua is already the most car shopping friendly place I know as we can park pretty close to the shops and then walk safety of the pedestrian precincts. It is a huge plus. Most people I know like the canopies but there could be some thought to reducing the wind tunnel effects. I am sure there is an engineering solution.We are already over supplied with shops in Porirua and it is difficult to see how some of them can be making any money. There is only so much cash about and the more shops we have the less viable they become. Natural market selection takes place and unprofitable shops close. With the slow growth predicted for Porirua, providing more shops will not attract visitors from outside Porirua. What we want is for more of the junk shops to close (they don’t give the city a good look anyway) and a few more high quality shops to open. That would be more in tune with the demographics of only a few more people but of growing affluence. I see the essential concept of a central pedestrian precinct surrounded by car parks is a good model for the centre and currently works well. The Mega Centre also works well with central car parks surrounded by shops.Making Hartham Court more attractive with a mini park and more trees might encourage more restaurants. But why not be more innovative. HC could be turned into a large open piazza with a car park underneath. That would significantly increase parking and provide one of the nicest city centre in the region. A great place for even functions attracting people to Porirua. I believe it should be sufficiently above the river/ high tide level to allow drainage. Has that option been considered?The walk through from Te Rauparaha Park to the Inlet might be nice and the idea of a waterfront development is innovative and could be attractive but very expensive and has to be somewhat pie in the sky at this time. Certainly nothing should be done that would preclude it later but it is likely to be much later.A lot of the proposed plan can be implemented because it is largely landscaping.
Opening up new streets or current pedestrian precincts would, in my opinion, be a retrograde step and do nothing to improve the area or the shopping experience. However improving pedestrian access from the railway station to HC might have advantages but few people currently arrive by train to go shopping.The plan as present begs the question about the S&EC outer wall that in winter will cast a long afternoon shadow into the park and will be something of an eyesore unless measures are taken to hide it. That could prove to be a real challenge.

The main issue is the central city centre square and the latest proposal is extremely questionable.

liz loves jenny

Jenny

My understanding is that there were two items 1.Forward work programmes for the committees and 2.The informal briefings on committee day. These meetings were for opportunities as chairs and deputies to be cohesive in our approach to the agendas ensuring that the direction set by Council is being met effectively and efficiently as well as an opportunity to raise any other business that may have risen that we may need to address.

Your unilateral decision today epitomizes your leadership - knowing you as I do now I guess I really shouldn't be surprised. The issues I wanted to raise was information that had been given to me regarding A&E I understood we are striving to build a relationship with the Health Board and thought it prudent for Council to ask for an explanation about the matters that had been bought to my attention however I have since read your media release and I guess I should follow your lead and go directly to the papers.
Liz

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny Brash - PCC" <JBrash@pcc.govt.nz> To: "Cr Liz Kelly" <liz@kellyhygiene.co.nz>; "Roger Blakeley - PCC" <RBlakeley@pcc.govt.nz> Cc: "Jenny Brash - PCC" <JBrash@pcc.govt.nz>; "Cr Euon Murrell - Work" <euon.murrell@gilliesgroup.co.nz>; "Cr Ken Douglas" <marilyn.ken@xtra.co.nz>; "Cr Sue Dow" <suedow@paradise.net.nz>; "Cr Robert Shaw" <robert@porirua.net> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007

11:38 AM Subject: RE: Meeting Cancelled: Informal Meeting of Chairs and Deputies with CE: 2 pm Thursday 19 July2007 > >

Liz

There were no aganda items which is why I supported cancelling the > > meeting. Nothing to do with people not mattering. As chair I am happy to > > meet with you and Roger to discuss matters you wanted brought up. Jenny

> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Liz Kelly [mailto:liz@kellyhygiene.co.nz] > > Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2007 11:24 a.m. > > To: Roger Blakeley - PCC > > Cc: Jenny Brash; Euon Murrell; marilyn.ken@xtra.co.nz; > > suedow@paradise.net.nz; ROBERT SHAW > > Subject: Fw: Meeting Cancelled: Informal Meeting of Chairs and Deputies with > > CE: 2 pm Thursday 19 July2007 > > > > > > Roger - are you telling the rest of us that we don't matter?? I actually > > have some matters I would like to discuss, privately will do now - if you > > are available? > > > > Liz > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Roger Blakeley - PCC" <RBlakeley@pcc.govt.nz> > > To: "Roger Blakeley - PCC" <RBlakeley@pcc.govt.nz>; "Jenny Brash - PCC" > > <JBrash@pcc.govt.nz>; "Cr Euon Murrell - Home" <murrells@xtra.co.nz>; "Cr > > Euon Murrell - Work" <euon.murrell@gilliesgroup.co.nz>; "Cr Ken Douglas" > > <marilyn.ken@xtra.co.nz>; "Cr Robert Shaw" <robert@porirua.net>; "Cr Liz > > Kelly" <liz@kellyhygiene.co.nz>; "Cr Naureen Palmer" > > <naureenp@familystart-porirua.org.nz>; "Cr Sue Dow" <suedow@paradise.net.nz> > > Cc: "Diane Koha - PCC" <DKOHA@pcc.govt.nz> > > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:35 AM > > Subject: Meeting Cancelled: Informal Meeting of Chairs and Deputies with CE: > > 2 pm Thursday 19 July2007 > > > > >> > > Jenny, Euon, Ken, Robert, Liz, Naureen, Sue >> > > >> > >

I have had apologies from Ken Douglas and Euon may not be able to get >> > > there-and thee are no agenda items! So after consultation with Jenny, >> > > the meeting is cancelled. Regards, Roger

our company attracts attention

better meeting in Whitby

The Whitby Residents Assocation meeting last week gave people a chance to talk in a sensible way. There were a few political hoists, but by in large it was educative. The need at the moment is for them to focus on what is needed in the reform of the District Plan. Work is being done, but the challenge is one of priorities.

Regarding the reform of the budget process, I had a chance to say some of the things I was trying to say to them early last year. Basically the same talk that I have given to Pukerua Bay, Plimmerton and Paremata associations. If you are interested in the financial managment of the council you should take a close interest in the budget process reforms.
r
Monday, July 23, 2007

politics in high places

‘Red Ken’ abandons Labour

Ken Douglas - the unionist once known as "Red Ken" - has abandoned the Labour Party to run as an independent at the upcoming local body elections.

Mr Douglas, a Porirua city councillor, withdrew his request to run on the Labour ticket after being dumped as a party candidate - along with fellow city councillor Litea Ah Hoi and former mayor John Burke - for the Porirua Community Trust. Mr Douglas has indicated dissatisfaction with some of the candidates selected by Labour as another reason why he will run as an independent."(But) I am not going to get into reasons, or the details, of the individuals concerned."

The three sitting trustees have been replaced on the Labour ticket for the trust elections by former city councillor Bud Lavery and present councillors David Stanley and Taima Fagaloa.

Mr Douglas will stand as an independent in the western ward at the October 13 elections, where he will face off against Labour candidates Henry Smith and Mr Lavery, a former Porirua Licensing Trust president.

He will also stand as an independent for the Porirua Community Trust.

A life-long unionist, Mr Douglas was founder of the Moscow-aligned Socialist Union Party, a secretary of the Federation of Labour, and foundation president of the Council of Trade Unions. He received the country's highest honour, the Order of New Zealand, in 1998.

He has been a member of Porirua City Council since 1998 - representing Labour after joining the party in time for the 2004 local body elections - and has been on the Porirua Licensing Trust since 2001.

He was elected to the Capital and Coast District Health Board in 2004, and is on numerous other boards, including those of Air New Zealand, New Zealand Post and the New Zealand Rugby Union.

windfarm is to be built soon

very nice statement, which i appreciate

Robert,

Just to pass on to you our congratulations for your AU$10,000.00 Ph.D. award. Such International recognition is hard won and obviously recognizes outstanding academic acumen and thinking. We’re really proud that one of our Councillors has received this kind of recognition. Well done. Helen and John

council's only company

health board - the wheels have fallen off

ROBERT COMMENTS:

The statement below is a concern often expressed. The privatisation of the emergency facility occurred a few years ago. The private facility in the town centre moved to the Kenepuru site. The arrangement was a sort of public private partnership. Nothing new is happening in terms of the philosophical foundation although the plan seems to be to change the private partners around. At the last meeting of the Porirua City Council City Services Committee I asked Cr Douglas as the deputy chair of the health board to comment on events. His response was that nothing had been decided and there were options.

It should be noted that the scheduled review of Kenepuru has been completed. It provided useful statistics and an assessment of how things are going. I became quite angry when I read it. The statistics show that the Pacific Island population is using Kenepuru but the Maori and Pakeha are not. The latter are rather obviously worried more about the charging set up, which frightens people, even though it is misunderstood.

It is good that the Pacific Island people are using the facility. They remain the New Zealanders with the greatest health needs.

Someone ought to ask about the economics of the whole facility at Kenepuru. It is rather obvious that the plans for income have not worked out, and that Kenepuru is costing the health board a bomb.

I was most angry when I read the white-wash in the report that was the "community consultation". I think I will write to the board and request all the documentation that pertains. Basically, they asked Ken Douglas and Margaret Faulkner as board members if all was well and they said it was all fine. Well it is not fine. The consultation committee established with the City Council was ignored evidently. At least those I spoke to had never heard of the review. The list of names of people consulted in the report (in two groups) was a shock -how on earth did they select that lot?

Also, it so happens that I know rather well many of the staff that work from the place, and they tell a totally different story. The community is most upset with Kenepuru, it staggers along without the proper levels of staffing, without the resources needed to service the community, and without a care. The stress on the staff is excessive and there are no credible plans to support Kenepuru.

The strike by specialist doctors has been reported in the media as being about pay. It is not. It is about the management medical split in this country. We ignore the highly trained medical specialists opinions about specialist matters and expect them to work under mangers who do not understand the issues. So long as the health board battles along with great community participation (which means, some selected people with loud mouths get to make the decisions) we are doomed to what we have. Thus spake Zarathustra.

r

SPOTLESS TRIES ITS DIRTY TRICKS

A virus is stalking our hospital wards – the virus of privatisation. The lockout of 800 staff in many hospitals has been brought about by the firm which has a contract for services that Boards use to run themselves. Some still do. This dispute involves staff who are employees of contractor Spotless Services an Australia transnational, which has refused to be part of the deal that the Service Workers Union negotiated for its 2000 members covering cleaners, kitchen workers and orderlies. Spotless will not agree to pay the new rates to new staff and with a 30% annual turnover that means a sizeable number of Spotlight staff will be on low rates.

Union organiser Alistair Duncan told the Health Boards affected that they controlled the premises, and they mustn’t let a rogue boss get away with low pay. Some of the Spotlight workers get $11.33 per hour – seven cents above the minimum wage.  

LETTER TO CCDHB

 “The Chief Executive Officer  Capital and Coast District Health Board WHITE CROSS AND BOARD SERVICES Information provided to a meeting in Porirua last week indicates your Board is considering proposals to privatize some Board services by setting up a Trust in which the White Cross organization will provide services currently provided by the Board. In terms of section 22 of the Health and Disabilities Act 2000 I request that you 1 Advise me of the nature of the proposals. 2 Make public the proposals you are considering. 3.Immediately set up procedures to ensure that the community can participate in any planning taking place on this proposal as required by Section 22. I understand a Board representative told the Porirua meeting that the Board regards this as a “management matter”.  On the contrary it is a significant amendment to the provision of health services and the Board has a responsibility to see that the Act is complied with.  

Please let me know urgently the action you propose to take to carry out your legal responsibilities to “foster community participation” in planning relating to this issue.” SGD JIM DELAHUNTY

Cr Green on the service lane

Brian Helm has been working on the Rates Inquiry

Discussion Paper and Alternative Proposal Submitted by:

Bryan Helm
15 Kiriwai Road, Paremata, PORIRUA 5024 Phone: 233 8250 Email: bhelm@paradise.net.nz

I make this submission as an individual and do not represent any other person or organisation. Introduction. This submission is in two parts. Part I is based on issues identified in the Rates Inquiry discussion paper. Part II outlines a possible alternative for funding local authorities based on income instead of property values.

SUBMISSION: PART I DISCUSSION PAPER PART 3 1

Rates.

The Porirua City Council produces a voluminous document detailing its proposed activities and costs. My interest is in new proposals and increased expenditure in existing ones and I find this difficult to identify from the document produced. I would prefer a simpler document. Something like “The Activity, its present cost, the amount and reason for any increase and the effect on rates and whether we support or oppose the proposal. A more detailed statement could be made available elsewhere.” I have made submissions in the past but no modification has ever been made by the Council to the issues I have raised. At least a questionnaire type document would provide a better reflection of opinion by the community and would likely result in a better response. I think the percentage of ratepayers who make a submission is fairly low. 2

Drivers of increased costs.

One factor can be a tendency of some councils to depart from their core activities and embark on ‘nice to have things’. Individually the cost may not be great but cumulatively this can be significant. Some councils are not as cost conscious as they could be. Activities, especially those relating to administration, might possibly be shared. Millions of dollars are spent on computer systems controlling information which is basically determined by legislation. It might be possible to have a service centre which provides the software for processing information which councils would connect to. The point I want to make is that councils should have a specific policy to explore the most economical way of undertaking any activity. Another factor could be the standards required of some infrastructure. Many schools have closed their swimming pool because of being too expensive to upgrade. Just how many infectious ailments have occurred to justify the upgrade? None that I know of at our local school which no longer has a pool. This raises the question of cost/benefit of standards. 3.

Trends in the use of rating tools to fund services.

As you will note from Part II of my submission I strongly favour rates being income related. If this is adopted ( a meeting I attended suggests this could be a popular option) a review of the rating tools available would have little relevance as would the type or value of the property on which the rates have been collected. I could however see merit in water being separately charged for, ie metered, as this would be better environmentally as users would be more aware of the cost of providing it and be less wasteful. If the present property value system is retained I would favour greater use of uniform annual charges as this would mitigate the inequity of fluctuating property values to some extent. 4.

Sources of revenue

User charges.

Depends on whether optional or compulsory. If someone is seeking a service then I believe that that person should meet at least the bulk of the cost. Eg. Dog registration or consents. If compulsory, such as rubbish then this user charge should be kept to a minimum as otherwise there will be a tendency to dump rubbish away from landfills and those on low incomes may find it difficult to meet higher costs. ·

Development contributions.

I am not aware of the split between developer and council but consider that the developer should pay at least most of the cost. ·

Fines.

Should definitely not be used for revenue gathering . This encourages enforcement for minor infringements and engenders a sense of injustice. Fines are imposed regardless of the ability to pay and a forgetful act could result in financial hardship.

Borrowing.

Should be a last resort option as interest either increases the cost of the project or reduces the funds available for a project if the available funds are capped. ·

Comments on other funding sources.

The other sources listed in (4) of the discussion document are of course the preferred ones but availability often limited. 5 Sustainability of rates Clearly the group affected is that containing those on a low income who are adversely affected by rising property values. This group is not static as changing fortunes determine ability to pay eg. retirement after receiving a high salary. Assets should be divorced from the ‘ability to pay’ discussion. Assets are built for a variety of purposes such as provision of a retirement income or a fund to meet medical expenses when health insurance is not held. Even if assets are built for the benefit of adult children, why should local authorities get the benefit of these assets.

This is one of the reasons why I propose an income related method of funding local authorities. 6. Rates rebates. No comment except to say that this would be redundant if income related rates is adopted. There should however still be some provision for government assistance for low income people. . 7.

Te Ture Whenua Maori Land.

No comment except to reiterate that income based rating would resolve these issues. 8. Exemptions I am not aware of the percentage by which Porirua City Council rates would decrease if exemptions were removed but I imagine the effect would be small. I strongly support the list of exemptions being retained while the property value related rating system applies. If it were abolished the consumer would most likely still pay through increased charges. Some community activities might have to cease if exemptions were removed assuming that the property tax system is retained. I would find it hard to believe that the increase in electricity charges was not influenced in some measure by councils ability to rate lines use. 9.

Other Revenue raising

The main principles for considering other methods for fund raising are that contributions should be according to ability to pay and that every person in receipt of an income from any source should make some contribution. I therefore favour a local tax and I have dealt with this in more detail in Part II of this submission. I do not favour other forms of taxes such as GST or payroll tax as the first does not reflect ability to pay and the second would place an unfair burden on business and absolve the majority in the community from having to contribute. Neither do I support special taxes for tourism. Tourists do not use many of a council’s resources. They do not use sports grounds or libraries or much in the way of cultural amenities. They probably use walkways but ware and tear from such use would be minimal. They do use water but contribute to the cost through their accommodation charge, The monetary benefits of tourism far outweigh the relatively small cost to councils and it is imperative that we do nothing to discourage tourism by adding to the costs of those businesses which provide services to tourists.

PART: II PROPOSAL FOR REVISED RATING SYSTEM

Objective.

To adopt a new system for funding local authorities by levying income and totally abandoning the present system of funding on property values. The Proposed System This applies to the residential sector only as business reform is best left to those directly involved in business. The proposal is that a small levy apply to all income regardless of source. This would include benefits and superannuation payments. In the case of benefits, Government assistance could be given if a beneficiary has difficulty in living on the allowance after the rates levy has been applied. This would be the same principle as help with rent etc, as is done at present A broader base than that for taxation is needed as some income is not taxed. My preference would be for the Government to determine the amount of the levy and collect it, then distribute it to local authorities according to population and some amenities. This would have the advantage of local authorities having to live within their income. However this proposal is likely to be strongly resisted. As a second option the local authority would be permitted to set the rate of the levy according to a formula prescribed by Government. Every person in receipt of an income would complete a Rates Declaration along with the normal tax code where applicable, which would record the local authority in which that person lives and the rate code there, regardless of where they actually worked.

A special “no Declaration” rate would apply and the levy retained by the local authority in which the person worked. A change of address notification would not be required until the next 1 April as I believe it would be impracticable to change codes whenever a worker moved home and ‘swings and roundabouts’ would generally compensate local authorities when this happened.. The paying organisation would deduct the levy in the same way as it does for tax and send the levy to the appropriate local authority.. This could be done electronically and automatically once the system is set up.

Advantages. ·

Payment based on income recognises ability to pay which is not the case with the present property tax · Although a few might pay more than the under the present scheme while employed , this would reduce when income fell following retirement or extended sickness. · Everyone benefits to some extent from council amenities so why should not all contribute in some measure. · Under the present system many who do not pay rates tend to lobby the council for some amenity which they might be less keen on having if they had to help pay for it. · There will be some saving through not having to value properties each three years and maintaining a rates and valuation register. · The need to send out periodic rates accounts would be eliminated. · No need for special rates exemption for certain property classes or targeted rates The Probable Levy Rate The calculations in the attached table are based on Porirua City. The levy could be 0.02360271 cents in the $ if Greater Wellington Rates are levied separately or 0.027746215 cents in the $ if Porirua and Greater Wellington Rates are combined. (See table attached) The total rates collected for Porirua amount to $39,755,198. However I have reduced this to a total of $27,338,246 as I have excluded business rates because I believe their rates should be calculated separately and for GST which in all justice should never have been included. GST I understand that this was added to rates because it was claimed that local authorities provide a service for their citizens who should therefore pay GST. Any service provided by local authorities is primarily of a social content and is no different from that provided by the Government which does not levy GST on normal taxes. Some common activities are provision of parks and walkways, and environment enhancement. As the Government does not add GST to those taxes which support their activities, why on earth should local authorities pay GST? Similarly, activities devolved from Government to local authorities did not attract GST before so why now? What is even more pernicious is that several activities paid for from rates are GST exempt. I refer to loan and interest repayments and contributions to the depreciation fund. The levying of GST is so unfair that it must be discontinued regardless of any outcome from the Rates Review. Calculating the Proposed Rates Levy The income groups in the attached table are from the 2006 Census. The income groups have been used to determine the total income pool on which to base my rates calculations. I then adjusted the Porirua City expenditure as already explained, then determined the rate in the $ as shown in the Table. Some 13% of those in the Census did not state their income and this understated the size of the pool for determining the rate of the Rates levy. That explains why an allowance has been made for this by reducing the levy rate by 13%. Some general outcomes I accept that these calculations are indicative only, as my assumption that had all income been stated that this would have increased the pool by 13%, may not be particularly accurate. I also accept that this proposal is not definitive. It is intended to offer an alternative to the inequitable property tax which must be replaced by something else and therefore I offer this proposal as an alternative. It should be noted that rate payers in Porirua pay a greater proportion of city expenditure in rates than those in many other local authorities because those authorities have more revenue earning assets which contribute to their income. The difference has been assessed at 20% which means that in the event of an income based rates system being adopted nationally, their levies could be 20% less than Porirua. A final observation is that if rates are divorced from property values then some nine items relating to property values listed in the Porirua discussion paper, would become irrelevant."

city centre

I have been facilitating discussions between Russell Black and council officers. The Council seeks to engage everyone in a thoughtful discussion about the city centre. Council must take action there, it is not an option to just leave it alone. There is more to be done, but below is Russell's report on one meeting.
r
Thursday, June 21, 2007

awards for great service

Pip Piper, Russell Morrison and Tiketi Auega were last night recognised for their outstanding contribution to Porirua City at the 2007 Civic Awards for VoluntaryCommunity Service.As well, Rosetta (Rosie) Gallen and Phil Jensen received Mayoral Certificates ofRecognition for community service given way beyond the call of duty.

Pip Piper has been an active member of the Plimmerton Residents' Association for over 20 years and is held in high regard by the community.He is an active member of Grey Power group, is a volunteer at Porirua PublicLibrary's genealogy section, works as a Citizens Advice Bureau volunteer and is amember of Senior Net helping others come to terms with new technology.Mr Piper has been a Justice of the Peace for many years and is an active member ofthe Plimmerton Croquet Club.In his working life, Mr Piper was an inspector with Educational Services and is aveteran WW2 pilot.Those nominating Mr Piper said helping others has been a feature of his whole life."He is highly regarded by all in the community for his unwavering contribution in a huge variety of ways."

Russell Morrison has lived in Paremata since he was 10 months old. He attendedParemata School and has been a member and Commodore of the Paremata Boating Club.Mr Morrison has been on the committee of the Paremata Residents' Association forabout 30 years and is currently Vice President.He was a founding member of the Transmission Gully Action Council, being itschairman and spokesman since 1990. He has been a member of the Guardians of theInlet since its inception and is a trustee of the Pauatahanui Inlet Community Trust.Those nominating him, say Russell's extensive local knowledge, passionate interest inthe area and ability to draft the necessary reports, letters, submissions etc means histime has been filled with research, crafting reports and papers, speaking and attendingmeetings."The Paremata Residents Association, Paremata residents and many others haverelied on and benefited from Russell's expertise and willingness to donate literallythousands of hours of his time.""Paremata residents as well as those interested in the preservation of the Inlet and/orthe construction of Transmission Gully owe Russell, who is still actively involved, an ongoing debt of gratitude."

Tiketi Auega is a founding member of the Porirua City Council Youth Council. He is also a member of the Porirua East Residents and Ratepayers Association as well as onthe board of the Porirua Pacific Forum. He is an educator and community liaisonofficer with Whitireia Community Polytechnic, and is the National Vice President ofthe Pacific National Educators Association, as well as a member of the CannonsCreek Opportunity Centre board."Tiketi Auega has immersed himself in serving his community of Porirua City, inparticular Porirua East...Tiketi is totally committed to working with all types ofcommunities...As young as he is, Tiketi continues to be a pioneer for his community and a dynamic young role model for the youth community and his people in general."

Rosie Gallen was born and bred in PoriruaSince 2002 she has been Housing New Zealand's Community Renewal Project Manager for Eastern Porirua.Those nominating Ms Gallen say the programme is making a huge impact in EasternPorirua and Rosie continually rises to the challenges involved in addressing industryand social issues in meaningful and sustainable ways.She has been instrumental in developing and implementing "Map to the Future', anappraisal of issues in Eastern Porirua which has been pivotal in changing strategicthinking and operational budgets to address the issues the community has identified asimportant."Rosie is a very capable strategic thinker. She is also very skilled at engaging withcommunities on their own terms."Rosie is a driving force behind the Cannons Creek Community Campus project,which has been involved in creating a new vision for Cannons Creek ShoppingCentre.As well, Rosie is a trustee on the Porirua Primary Health Organisation, deputy chairof the Porirua Healthy Safer City Trust, chair of the Porirua Community Guardiansgovernance group, as well as a community patroller, advisor to Cannons CreekOpportunity Centre, founder of the Tuakana youth programme and many more.She was instrumental in nurturing the Waitangirua Action Group and worked behindthe scenes to help establish the Aoga Amata Porirua early childhood facility, whichopened in 2005."Rosie has a keen eye for the potential in people and community organisations.""Helping people achieve their potential is much more than just a job for Rosie - sheworks tirelessly for HNZC tenants, their surrounding communities and for Porirua City as a whole."

Philip Jensen joined Porirua City council in 1993 and since then has been employedin the control and eradication of graffiti and other vandalism within the city. He leadsa team of three."Phil has always approached this soul-destroying task with an energy and vigourwhich is admired by all he comes in contact with...Such is his energy andcommitment to the job that he commonly works weekends to ensure the criminalsdon't get a "free pass".In addition to his work with Council, he also takes troubled youth under his wing tomentor them. These youth are normally referred to him by Police or Courts.

more on the fence - 223 people !!!

Hi Robert

Thank you for both coming yesterday and blogging congratulations. Whilst Tim does a huge amount for the community, congratulations in this instance should fairly and squarely go to Dave Anderson, our Chief Volunteer Fire Officer  as well as to all the other members of the PRA, the Fire Brigade, our local Red Cross, the School, the Baptist Church and the Anglican Church for all their support as well. Particular thanks need to go to all the members of the Community who rang with offers of help, delivered flyers, baked cakes and cheerfully turned up to lend a hand.

Our sponsors – Mana New World, Resene Paints, Café Vella and Brights Building Supplies were just amazing in their helpfulness and generosity.

Needless to say we couldn’t have achieved this result without the help of many Council Officers who worked with us to achieve the end result from doing risk management plans through to water  blasting.

Our intention from the start (when you will remember those early efforts to get a “Plimmerton Chapter” in the LTCCP) was to encourage and promote Community building through the Village Planning exercise as a means to enhance our community. We’re on the way to keep building on this with lots of ideas for the future and were obviously thrilled with the turnout where the final count was 223 people helping in one way or another both at the scene and behind the scene.

We have lots of photos and many will be on display in the local coffee shop before the end of the week. I will email others as they come to hand.

The final coat of paint needs to go on next Sunday after the Kindy mid –winter swim at 1.00pm. Here’s hoping we get plenty of stalwarts to help us with that task as well, energised by their dip in the cold water!

Northern Ward Councillors and paint

Thank you again for your support and the support of all our Northern Ward Councillors, the Mayor and to Chris Findlayson, M.P.

Regards

Helen

ROBERT COMMENTS

There is a very perceptive comment in the above email. Few people understand the village strategy work FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE COUNCIL. The comment about the LTCCP leads to some important insights. More on this later.

Further photographs will be posted shortly. Comments also welcome. Keep emailing them to me.
r

rates miracle

I am pleased to announce that the rates rise this year has been reduced by one whole percent (subject to the decision-making of Council). You may not think that is much, but it represents an incredible amount of work from a small group of councillors.

The average rates rise for householders this year will be 3.7 percent, and not the 4.7 percent proposed in the Draft Annual Plan. The overall rise will be 5.3 percent, which is reduced from 6.3 percent in the Draft.

The only way to deal with the financial pressures on the Council, if your goal is to reduce the rates, is to alter the way we do the budgeting. Much work has been done on this particularly at the councillors retreat.
r
Tuesday, June 19, 2007

MR WATSON REPLIES

Rates Miracle - Come off it Robert! What is so non-miraculous is that this is an election year. Will a one percent rates reduction save some councillors' bacon? Now I'm in favour of elections being held annually.
Regards - John Watson

how do we rank on quality of life?

If Wellington is the 12th best city in the world, and Auckland 5th, Porirua City must be pretty much the top of the list!!

http://www.mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1173105

whitby meeting

ROBERT COMMENTS

Tim is right that I did not write much about the Whitby meeting. The meeting was in two distinct and contrasting parts.The presentations on the village strategy by Robin and Tim were excellent. The councillor presentation was inaccurate when it was specific, repleat with sweeping generalisations, and not informed by the recent work of the Council. Two councillors said to me they felt insulted by the meeting. It was in very marked contrast to the Plimmerton AGM. This was the second meeting at Whitby in the same vein. The Council's chief executive and I answered the first meetings allegations in the Whitby NewsBrief. The chief exeutive's points were ignored in the second meeting. Indeed, the same allegations were repeated. Enough said. I really do not want to go there! (excuse the pun)

Tim asks why I did not blog his meeting. The answer is simply pressure of work. We were trying to clear the Annual Plan and and there were several issues that particular residents had with Council decisions (one to do with a Plimmerton walkway). These take time. Also, the roading issue has been demanding attention.
r

LETTER FROM TIM

Dear Robert

I have just returned from overseas and have caught up with your blog on the recent Whitby Residents’ Assn last meeting. Of course I am not a member of that association, but I was there and I think you do them a disservice in your fairly dismissive reporting of their meeting. Yes, they did have an important first brainstorming session on the development of a local village strategy. Robin Gunston did a superb job in setting the scene for that and it was great to see all the people present getting involved – this is true grassroots democracy. But no, you are not correct in saying that councillors were not invited to speak. The keynote presentation was to have come from your colleague John Green, but since he was in hospital it was delivered by the RA Chair Jim Dearsly. This might have been before you arrived (since you had been chairing the City Services Cttee), so let me assure you that it was a useful overview of many of the key local issues for Whitby residents. Since it was a Residents’ Assn meeting it seems to me that the presence of councillors - and their participation like all other attendees – is most welcome, but it seems to me a bit pretentious for you to expect to have more than one councillor given a formal speaking slot on the RA agenda. Did you put your hand up to contribute anything along the way? I also disagree with your dismissal of the rest of the meeting. Yes, you’re right in saying that both the Mayor and Sue Dow left after the brainstorming session, but Jenny apologised that she had another commitment and couldn’t stay; ie I don’t think we should assume she went in response to any criticism of Council, as you suggested. You acknowledge that the first part of the meeting, on the village strategy, was “useful” but then claim the second part of the meeting was a “barrage of inaccurate stuff about the council that I did not deem worth answering”. So what was the rest of the meeting? Essentially it was another guest speaker, namely Moi! I had been invited to explain to the Whitby RA what we in the Plimmerton RA had been up to recently, especially with regards to our experience with village strategies. I am disappointed you thought that was worthless. While you are entitled to your opinion as to the worth of my address, I think it is unfairly misleading for you to tell your blog readers it was an attack on council. Indeed I believe my whole tone was positive and enthusiastic (indeed, one of the appreciative members of the audience said I was “inspirational” and another thought I was “evangelising”!). Since you have clearly forgotten what I said, let me remind you that my key message was that in Plimmerton we had found the experience of village strategising to have energised our wider community, with many more people now getting involved in community matters. I explicitly recognised the role of Council in this and saw it as a harbinger of a renewed focus on grassroots democracy. If you like I’ll send you a copy of my speech notes and I would challenge you to find anything in them that would justify your assessment of them as a “barrage of inaccurate stuff about the council”. Don’t you think you owe me an apology? You claim to be an active supporter of Residents’ Associations so I’m a bit surprised that you both criticise the Whitby meeting and also have not yet blogged anything at all on the Plimmerton RA AGM you attended two weeks ago. Perhaps you think even less of that meeting since we didn’t have any formal agenda item for councillors to address us, but of course as Chair I did identify the councillors present, welcomed you and thanked you all for your service – what more do you want? We had about 100 residents attending (it was standing room only), which seems to support my claim that the village strategy process we followed seems to have galvanised us all. Of course we had an excellent drawcard speaker in Ian Athfield and his thoughts will be helpful to us all in the District Plan Review – something you yourself referred to in your welcome contribution from the floor.
Regards Tim Sheppard

plimmerton fence paint

Congratulations to Helen Chipper and Tim Shepherd and the team of over 150 fence painters.This job was one of the outcomes of the village strategy work begun four years ago (at least).

I found the day elating. The rain just managed to stay away long enough to make the whole thing a success. I had plenty of interesting discussions with people about all manner of Plimmerton and Council issues.

Chris Findlayson, MP

Comments on the event are welcome for the blog. More photos would be good. It is a fantastic achievment for Plimmerton - the look of the place has improved beyond measure.
r
Sunday June 17, 2007

haunui bush, pukerua bay

UPDATE

The property has evidently been sold to to a Waikato farmer who intends to live in the house. He says he will add two properties to the estate, remove the pine trees and supports the bush being maintained. The Pukerua Bay Residents' Association is delighted with this proposal.
r
Monday, June 18, 2007

PUBLIC MEETING

This issue was discussed at a public meeting tonight. I was asked to present a petition to the Council.

It asks for protection for the Haunui Bush and the Charles Gray Homestead.

I know the area well having watched my own children play there and having looked in the gully for evidence of human beings (never found anything but I did see some interesting birds). I always assumed the bush was a public reserve and the house in private ownership. Foolish assumption. Peter Jackson also used to play there evidently, and he shot a film there in his early days, or so I am told.

Haunui Bush and the Charles Gray Homestead are being considered as areas for development. Council's actions regarding this matter will depend on the nature of the land ownership. The existing rules in the District Plan will apply. Allegedly, 3.49 ha is for sale. I am not sure how accurate that is, but it is what is being said in the community. On the face of it, it would be expensive to make the area a reserve.

See the map below.

r
Thursday, June 14, 2007

LETTER THAT PERTAINS

plimmerton residents' association agm

I have been asked to say something about the recent Plimmerton Residents' Association meeting that was chaired by Tim Shepherd and featured the architect Ian Athfield.

I thought the meeting went very well. It addressed all the normal protocols and had ideas that were relevant and expanding.

Ian Athfield says at every meeting he attends at Porirua that we should make all resource consents contingent upon the approval of neighbours. In the jargon, "noncompliant" with the District Plan. There is food for thought in this. It is impractical, but that aside there is an important concept.

One feature of the meeting was the way the Assocaiton recognised the role of council officers in the business of decision-making. There has been a very deliberate attempt made to form a partnership between the RA's and the Council at both the officer and the councillor level. Blog readers will know that I figured out that over 80% of what involved RA's is management and not governance. It is good to see engagement between the Assocation and the management of Council.

The meeting was light-hearted and positive. That augurs well for the future.

Incidentally, the meeting round this week has been "philosophical". The ceo is on leave and the agenda is light. Discussions about budget process have begun but there is a very long way to go before the scheme decided at the councillors' retreat is implemented.Also, begun was further discussion about the rate of progess with the District Plan work. Fact is there are signficant problems of a practial kind and we have to be patient. This is not something the community want to hear. However, I can remember some years ago when I was the only one saying we needed to redo the DP as a matter of urgency and no one seemed to be that much interested. Now they are saying it is too slow. One cannot win.
r

Thursday, June 14, 2007

progress with the reform agenda - one year on

THIS IS THE BLOG STATEMENT FROM ABOUT A YEAR AGO

I AM GOING TO USE IT TO MONITOR PROGRESS NOW

About six months ago Council began a dramatic reformation of its own functioning. This is based around the restructuring of governance functions but has wide implications for the Council officers as well. Elsewhere in the blog are details of why this work is necessary. So, what is the state of play?

SUCCESSES

Thus Spake Zarathustra

what am I doing this week?

Someone asks me what I am doing this week. It is a part of the self-serving notion that what is most important thing about councillors is that they attend residents' assocation meetings.The recently made accusations about meeting attendance are from rebels in search of a cause. Over 15 years I have been an active supporter of RAs without hearing that particular bleat. I still remember with fondness my time on the Pukerua Bay RA, not to mention the kindy committee where I fell asleep in an evening meeting. There was myself and about 12 women on the committee. One day I might answer the current season of "you have not attended our meeting", although until now I have been happy to watch, they do no harm.

Meeting attendance at the council has been intereting as three councillors went on strike for a bit over a year. This became possible with the move from meeting fees to mini-salaries. There absence meant the rest of us had to watch the numbers present. They are all back attending now that the election is upon us.

I am also reminded that I have not said much about the Whitby Residents' Assocation AGM. It was in two parts: the useful part on their village stragegy where they are two years behind everyone else, and a barrage of inacurrate stuff about the council that I did not deem worth answering; not that the councillors present were invited to speak (one and the Mayor left early recognising this).

Actually, the top issue this week is the village strategy policy (long email from officers appeared this morning, responding to my discussion). We are getting things clearer. I will visit the ceo specially on this, probably at 7 am later in the week). My immediate goal is to get the rules into formal policy now. There is likely to be a review of the whole business in about a year's time. I may not be voted back to be present in a year, hit by a bus, whatever.

I have in mind to answer Mike Doig's letter in the Kapi Mana. He makes a good point that should draw a response from the Council. His example is Mana Esplanade, but he would have made his point better with Transmission Gully.Either way, the question about the basis of decisions should be discussed.

Just scheduled a meeting with Darcy Nicholas who is the new General Manager Cultural Services. This is about the priorities for the City Services Committee. I want to run through his whole set of responsibilities and discuss what are the key goals right now.

There is also work regarding chairperson's meetings (two scheduled).

Tuesday night: chief executives' employment committee.

Wednesday: Council meeting on the Annual Plan.

Apart from running a course for second year degree students on an aspect of management, and writing www.astronomyaotearoa.net and doing some more prepartation for a conference (see www.pesa.org.au), it is a pretty ordinary week.
r
Tuesday, June 5, 2007

interfaith

staff changes

Roger Blakeley
Chief Executive
Porirua City Council

whitby blog on village planning

Robin Gunston writes:

 

"Feel free to circulate this to anyone in Whitby/Council- put it in your favourites and visit regularly

 

Anything you want put on it send to me please

 

Presentation material from last meeting and an outline of the process will be up here soon

 

Robin"

campaign blogs in porirua

Watch for we blogs and web sites from councillor and mayoral candidates. I know of three in the making.

Remember:

http://www.robertshaw.orcon.net.nz/mayor.html

consult on city centre

CEO
PCC

Roger

Item
10. Porirua City Centre Revitalisation Plan
This has potential to remould the future of Porirua City.
What possible reason can there be to forward this item direct to the full
Council meeting and exclude "stakeholders" including ratepayers from public
participation in the normal committee process?

11. Porirua City Council Submission to Greater Wellington's Annual Plan
Likewise above.
Also, PCC has had a year to anticipate the deadline so why was it necessary
to put the submission in on the closing day (under officer delegation) and
now seek retrospective approval of the Council?

Graeme E

Graeme Ebbett
Chairman
Titahi Bay Residents Assn Inc
C/- 37 Terrace Rd, Titahi Bay, Porirua.
Work Ph 568 6377, Fx 568 2374
Home Ph 236 8574, Fx 236 8591
Email ebbett.automation@clear.net.nz


ADDENDUM

people think porirua is a dangerous place because of the court - the crime is elsewhere but we have the court

Cash and $160,000 in P found in raids Dominion Post -

Saturday – 26 May 2007 Porirua police have seized methamphetamine with a street value of $160,000 in an operation targeting the Mongrel Mob. About $137,000 in cash was also confiscated. Two men have been arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine for supply, and one man has pleaded guilty to the same charge. Another man, 32, will appear in Porirua District Court on June 3 for a pre-depositions hearing over $97,000 of cash that police allege relates to his, and the Porirua Mongrel Mob's, methamphetamine dealing. Detective Senior Sergeant Mike Oxnam said the size of the drug seizures was "significant" but not enough to make a dent in street supply. He said the most disappointing aspect of the drug haul was that many marae throughout the country were trying to tackle the growing P problem by running anti-methamphetamine programmes. "But we've got this Maori gang and they are flying in the face of mainstream Maori." Mr Oxnam said a stash of goods worth thousands of dollars was also recovered from the Paekakariki home of one of the men. He said he believed that it was stolen from cars throughout the Wellington region. "It shows the direct link between drug dealing and property crime," Mr Oxnam said. "There is also lots of violent crime associated with drug-dealing. "We put a lot of resources into policing the Mongrel Mob and this is just a part of it."

He added that the Mongrel Mob featured strongly in all crime statistics ranging from serious violent crime, organised crime and drug-dealing to family violence, theft and traffic offences.

Two of the charged men were arrested at Wellington airport on May 23 after a 40-year-old, allegedly carrying 80 grams of methamphetamine, had arrived on a flight from Auckland.

A search of his Paekakariki house uncovered the goods police allege are stolen. He appeared in Wellington District Court and was remanded in custody to reappear on June 1. A 39-year-old, allegedly in possession of 20g of the drug, was also at the airport. He appeared in Wellington District Court and has been remanded on bail and curfew at his home address. Relating to a separate incident, a man, 25, pleaded guilty in Porirua District Court to possession of methamphetamine for supply after 60g of the drug, and $40,000, was found at his home.

Mana Esplanade and St Andrews Road, Traffic Review

Last night an extraordinary meeting of the City Services Committee passed three motions to establish the review and ask Transit to attend to some current problems. The next hurdle is the appointment of a consultant to conduct the review. It needs to be a firm that has not been involved in the project to date and they need a range of skills.

This work is an example of how the Council should function as an advocate for residents. We heard from Tim Shepherd and Russell Morrison from the Plimmerton and Paremata residents' assocations respectively. Councillors agreed with their submissions that more action was required, and the Committee followed that through to a decsion what was unanimous.

Jenny Brash did good work to bring forward current issues and the Council has asked Transit to tend to some specifics.

I gave everyone an undertaking that the matter will be regularly reported to the City Services Committee, because of its importance. This is the first time since I became chairperson of that Committee that I have asked for something to be reported to the Committee for information. The rule is that the committee only considers things that require a decision. Not things for information, which are distributed to councillors through a weekly bulletin from the chief executive. The rule is broken in this particular case.
r
Friday, May 25, 2007

robin gunston - whitby strategy

At last the Whitby Residents' Association has begun work on the village strategy. A great lead off was given by Robin Gunston who has plenty of experience in futures work and the managment of community projects.

The process developed is direct and immediate. The extent to which the Whitby community can be engaged in the process remains to be seen.

Different communities have taken different approaches to the development of their suburbs. In some cases there have been very large numbers of meetings and in others very few. We can expect some written material about his shortly.
r
Friday, May 25, 2007

sports and events

i am asked

Why not make the blog open to everyone who wants to make a comment without my having any control. The answer is that as the publisher I would be responsible for the statements on the blog and people say things that are not very nice. What is more those things can attract legal action.

There have been people who have asked me to take things off the blog. If they are things they have written I generally oblige. If they did not write them I do not oblige. The exception is material that relates to council officers. In the past there have been things on the blog that have upset staff. There are some serious judgements to be made about such things.

Amusingly, the person who asked for the blog to provide free access, did not want their statement on the blog.

Incidentally, the Sports and Events Centre contract was approved this evening. The project now is to be run by the chief executive.
r
Tuesday, May 22, 2007

who should be on the council?

Council Elections 2007

Plimmerton Residents’ Association committee works closely with Porirua City Council and we have gained some clear views on our elected representatives. Not surprisingly some of them are good and work hard for us, while others are not so good and seem to do little outside Council meetings. We want to help elect only those candidates who will listen, discuss and act on the key issues for this community and for Porirua as a whole.

We intend to approach all candidates for the Northern Ward positions and seek their views on some key issues. Last election some of our current Councillors couldn’t even be bothered to respond to our questions. We’ll let you know what they say this time.

We’ve had talks with other residents’ associations and we feel candidates need to respond positively to these matters:

We need to consider also which candidates have the ability and time to participate fully as a councillor. We think the role is much more than just attending Council meetings. We are looking to elect dynamic, forward-looking people who really care about this community and will do everything to promote our best interests.  You may have other hot issues you would like the residents’ association to explore with candidates.   If so, please let us know at:  pippiper@paradise.net.nz

ROBERT COMMENTS

It is good that Pip opens up this debate. There are plenty of strange views out there about what councillors actually do, and what they should do. I will write more about it when I have more time.
r
Monday, May 21, 2007

user pays aspect of land transport

FUEL TAX CAN SPEED TRANSMISSION GULLY BUILD

Porirua City Council is pleased that yesterday's budget announcement included the provision for a regional fuel tax, says City Services Committee Chairperson Robert Shaw.

"It has always been the case that a significant part of the money for TransmissionGully would come from the people of the Wellington region,"

Councillor Shaw says.providing a10 cents a litre regional fuel tax could be used to pay the $470 millionfunding shortfall for Transmission Gully.Latest estimates put the motorway costs at $955 million and the Government hascommitted $485 million.

However, this estimate could come down once the current geotechnical and preliminary design studies are completed."In land transport projects of this magnitude there needs to be a sharing of the costs.This recognizes that there are both national and regional benefits to come from the new motorway."

Councillor Shaw says contributions could come from a fuel tax and tolls."The concept of tolling for the Transmission Gully motorway has been discussed overthe past 10 years and work has been done on how smart tolling could be implemented."He says the new funding mechanism also reduces potential financial pressure on local ratepayers.

"The region has a major input on projects like Transmission Gully through the Regional Land Transport Strategy which is based on extensive public consultation. It will be interesting to see what the public reaction is to this news."

COMMENT FROM BLOG READER

i requisitioned a meeting

MEETING CALLED TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC ISSUES IN MANA

An Extraordinary Meeting of the City Services Committee will be held next week toprogress action on traffic and other problems on SH1 in Mana.

City Services Committee Chairperson Robert Shaw has asked Council Chief Executive Roger Blakeley to advise the meeting on how more rapid progress can bemade to resolve traffic safety concerns along St Andrews Road and Mana Esplanade.

"At last week's meeting of the City Services Committee we heard presentations fromTransit NZ and representatives of the Plimmerton and Paremata residents'associations. The concerns raised by the residents were echoed by Councillors."

"One of these was confusion over progress on resolving terms of reference for an independentreview of the operation and safety of the upgrade of SH1 from Paremata toPlimmerton including Mana Esplanade, T2 Lanes and St Andrews Road."

Last November, Councillor Shaw chaired a meeting of the Council with Transit NewZealand and other stakeholders and it was agreed the two organisations would worktogether to agree terms of reference for the review.

Dr Blakeley has been in discussion with Transit Chief Executive Rick van Barneveldand yesterday was assured that the terms of reference will be resolved by next week'smeeting.

Councillor Shaw welcomed the news."I look forward to hearing Transit New Zealand's response and making some forwardmovement in addressing our and residents' concerns."

The Extraordinary Meeting will be held in the Council Chambers at 5.30pm onThursday 24 May 2007.

management re-structure

PCC WORKING SMARTER FOR THE CITY

A recent review of Porirua City Council aims to provide value to ratepayers through integrated Council processes and services for the city, says Chief Executive Roger Blakeley.

“I initiated this review because Council has particular challenges ahead in ensuring we continue to provide high quality services to our city. To do this we need to manage our finances, our communities and our environment in a sustainable way and this requires prudent management of resources with smart systems,” he says.

With the help of consulting firm ChangeWorks, a draft report on the organisational review was presented to Council staff in March for their consideration and feedback.

“The consultants reported favourably on the quality of comments made by over 100 PCC staff and were very impressed with their level of commitment to serve the best interests of Porirua City. This illustrates the degree of skill and dedication present in our staff that has contributed to the past successes we have enjoyed as a Council.”

Dr Blakeley says feedback from staff was invaluable in informing the final report, released last week (10 May), which outlines some structural and process changes at the Council.

These include a new Council structure of five General Managers responsible for Community Services, Environment and Regulatory Services, Asset Management and Operations, Corporate Services and Strategy and Planning reporting to the Chief Executive.

The positions of General Manager, Asset Management and Operations and General Manager Community Services are being advertised internally.

The new GMs will take up their roles on 1 July 2007 when the new organisational structure will start taking effect.

Dr Blakeley says he wants an organisational structure that is integrated and aligned to its strategy and a Council that works as one team.

“It also requires business excellence in all we do, from operational matters to customer service and cost control. To assist in this I have created a new position of Business Excellence Co-ordinator and this will be advertised in the next few weeks.

Dr Blakeley says change can unsettle people and he has valued the patience and professionalism of the Council staff during the review period.

Thank you from Toi Maori Market Limited

election dates

27th July..............NOMINATIONS OPEN.

24th August.........NOMINATIONS CLOSE.

13th October.......ELECTION DAY

11th December... (.Last Day for Candidate Expenditure to be Lodged. )

24th October.......INAUGRAL COUNCIL Meeting ( Swearing in. )

plimmerton

You are warmly invited to the

  Plimmerton Residents’ Assn AGM

With Guest Speaker Ian Athfield

  On Monday 28 May at 7.30pm

  Plimmerton Pavilion, Sunset Parade

CASH PRIZES FOR BEST IDEAS ON RATES INQUIRY

Ten prizes of $100 have been won by submitters who had the best rate review suggestions.

The cash prize was offered by an anonymous donor keen to encourage the public to come up with ideas for the Porirua Steering Group on the Government's Inquiry into Rates and Local Authority Funding.

The Steering Group identified a range of alternatives to property tax for raising revenue and urged all residents to have their say. As an extra incentive, a Porirua resident offered a $1000 prize pool for submissions. In the end 160 submissions were received and it was decided to split the money between the ten most "thoughtful and insightful", with businesses, residents' associations and individuals and families recognised.

The ten submitters who won the cash are: Business North City Shopping Centre, Kiwi Property Income Residents' Associations Plimmerton Residents' Association Whitby Residents' Association Individuals and Families Catherine Vriens, Porirua East Dave and Robyn Parker, Whitby Thakshan and Susila Fernando, Papakowhai Nick Collins, Paremata Bryan Helm, Papakowhai Mike Gould, Plimmerton Clive Millanta and Dick Renouf, Titahi Bay

The Steering Group's final submission to the Government's Inquiry said the current system of funding local authorities was "fatally flawed" and that a new system based on income tax or GST should be introduced.

The six member Steering Group comprised Mayor Jenny Brash, John Seddon, Trevor Roberts, John Watson, Margaret Guthrie and Alan Gray . Mr Roberts said public feedback through submissions strongly supported the view that the current property tax-based system was neither fair nor affordable; that the current rating system did not meet the normal tests for taxation of efficiency, simplicity, transparency, sustainability and fairness, and that improvements were needed.

All submissions are being considered by the Government's three-member Inquiry Panel and a final report is due to be presented to Minister of Local Government Mark Burton on July 31

meetings yesterday

Yesterday we had the Strategy and Finance Committee meeting, briefings by the chief executive on 5 topics, and then the City Services Committee meeting.

The council chamber was packed for most of it, with a particularly large audience in the afternoon. I use the word "audience", which is clearly the wrong word, but the way some councillors play to them suggests it is not far from the truth. There is an aspect of showpersonship in councils. One should not be concerned about this side of the council, politics is the name of the game at the moment (preparations for the election are well underway, expect web sites, celebrity endorsements, painted vans, and inventive campaigning - none of which relates to anyone's ability to do the job), and so long as the quality of decision-making does not drop that is fine.

Incidentally, the Labour Party has selected most of its candidates. Cr David Stanley has been removed from their ticket and given a spot on the trust instead. Their mayoral candidate will stand for a councillor position as a Labor candidate in the north. The same two will be their health board ticket (Douglas and Faulkner). Labour hopes to win a councillor seat in the north and hence bring back its control of the council. John Burke will be their candidate for the regional council and Barbara Donaldson who is Labour will stand as an independent. Do not be fooled by talk that they are all fighting amongst themselves. They are, but that is not the relevant point. When it comes to campaigning the Labour Party in Porirua is in its element. They complain about each other but they work together most effectively. They know how to campaign and they are well supported by central government people.

The Committee meetings went well although it was the longest set of meetings in recent times. This was in large part because of the issues around roading and the appearance of Transit New Zealand in the form of the regional manager, Mr Taylor. There is some frustration with the pace of decision-making and the direction of decision-making. I have undertaken to follow up on a short list of specifics and will do so. Prime among them is the clearance of the terms of reference for the Mana Esplanade review.

Other items of note include decisions on the Plimmerton park-and-ride extension. The Youth Policy is now in place, and a councillor had the bright idea of asking the youth what they are now going to do (with our assistance). Financial management issues are present, and I have been checking out some of the variances. Looks as if it will all sort, although there is some extra information I require.

A councillor a few weeks ago asked me and others with apparent frustration "what do the regional council do". He did not say anything when the regional council provided their submission on the bulk water supply. There is an increase in the cost of bulk water (3%) and that will impact on the PCC budget. This is being driven by preparations for increased capacity, but that need is still a very long way off. One interesting matter was a brief discussion about why Wellington and Hutt cities fell flat on their collective faces when they tried to save money by contracting out water services within their cities (this is not the bulk supply which is managed by GW).

By the way, members of the community (including John Watson) and the chief executive presented an oral submission to the rates review. That review is trying to find a way to make sensible recommendations likely to fly It is one thing to draw a conclusion and another thing to have Parliament change the law.

The Police did not appear at the meeting, or rather they did appear but had to rush away before speaking. There was an emergency in Tawa. Typical of Tawa to hinder politics in Porirua. The gang issue was aired and there will be a special session on it in six weeks time at the Committee and provided the people of Tawa behave themselves we will hear from the Police.

Everyone at council - officers and councillors - are working incredibly hard at the moment. The number of meetings on specific topics is very high. For example, we have the sports and events centre decisions around tendering looming, the District Plan work, the re-write of the contract for the chief executive, many contracts are being re-worked with sports organisations and community groups of different kinds. The youth policy has generated more work.

Incidentally, it is the season for the review of fees and several papers went through the Strategy and Finance Committee to adjust fees. People raise these things as issues but when I talk about the funding policy (which is the analysis that underpins the fees schedules themselves) and the reasons for particular decisions, they all seem to fall asleep.

Civic awards time again. In the public-excluded session I asked the councillors to speak to each of the people nominate, in turn. Councillors did not want to say much, although some made good comments. I then took a straw poll by having people record their 4 preferences. Then the motion was moved according to the straw poll and the decisions were made. What is new is that the councillors no longer have to decide on the day and time of the presenation, the venue, and all the small details. This is one thing that was recently delegated to the chief executive. I was interested to note that this is the second round that has been made since the delegation. Last time there were questions about why do we not decide the venue and so on. This time, it did not occur to anyone ask anything about the practical details. Successful delegation, I would say.

Finally, Porirua City residents have every reason to be proud of their Council yesterday. Although the issues were alive, emotions ran high, and there was much frustration; the decisions made were very sound, councillors did not abuse each other in any way, the officers advice was helpful and concise, and councillors worked through a complex agenda with good focus.
r
Friday, May 11, 2007

gangs in porirua city

jim again

So far as I know every person accused by Jim of being a part of this block vote has denied it. But still Jim continues with his allegations. First he agrees there is no block vote and then he goes on to say "if this group is secretly deciding to block vote ..."

I wish to make it very clear to Jim Dearsley that I am not "suggesting" that I am not involved in any block voting scheme. I absolutely deny it. I resent his refusal to take my word for it, and I must say that in my 15 years in local government this is the first time that anyone has refused to take my word for anything.

The meeting records show that the alleged conspirators vote all over the place at meetings. Councillors do need courage to vote as their reason dictates in the interests of the city as a whole. I have had plenty of experience voting alone against motions both at the city and regional councils.

Finally, regarding this: "WRA is not alone in believing that the consultation process as currently applied is a sham. Those views are shared by the other RAs in Porirua and gained over many years". What you are not told is that I specifically spoke to the Pukerua Bay Residents Association, the Plimmerton Residents' Assocation and the Paremata Residents Assocation about plans to rework the way the Council consults. The Whitby Residents' Assocation refused my request to address them (twice). The councillors and officers considered my proposal in detail at a retreat at Masterton. There were long and careful discusisons. The result is we are implementing new procuedures. To see the details on these matters check the earlier blogs. I note that the councillor who Jim says he is supporting in the election, did not attend the critical Masterton session.
r
Wednesday, May 9, 2007

WHITBY NEWSBRIEF ARTICLE

Submission to the Whtby NewsBrief: Report on WRA AGM – Part 2 Facts or spin –

We want answers and accountability.

Last month we reported on the very successful and enlightening AGM but space prevented coverage of the meeting session that addressed the residents’ perception of Council’s performance and our loss of confidence with some councillors. The report continues.

The chairman reiterated the main points of the WRA’s submission on the Long Term Community Council Plan (LTCCP) and the consultation process. He expanded further on the issues raised in the February issue of WNB that have stirred Dr Blakeley, Council’s CEO, and Clr Shaw to respond in last month’s issue. At least it seems we have gained their attention.

WRA is not alone in believing that the consultation process as currently applied is a sham. Those views are shared by the other RAs in Porirua and gained over many years. According to Dr Blakeley, we are all wrong. He is of course right in the sense that the “process” steps through the procedure according to the planned timetable but, if ultimately the Council only “listens” to those who say what it wants to “hear”, the end result is indeed a sham. At the AGM our councillors assured us they listened but the LTCCP outcome leaves us unconvinced that we were taken seriously bearing in mind the weight of community support expressed in our survey of residents. Sometimes I wonder if we and Dr Blakeley are reading from the same LTCCP. On page 63 it shows “Average effects on ratepayers” as annual percentage increases over the first five years of the plan They are 7.9, 5.3*, 5.1, 2.2 and 5.0% and those figures already take account of increases in the rating base. That compounds to an increase of 28%. Allowing for inflation of 2.5% pa (compounds to 13% over five years) means we can expect rates increase over five year of 15% over baseline inflation but Dr Blakeley still says we are wrong!

Add the 6% increase in residential rates in 2005/06 means that rates will have increased by one third in six years or 18.5% ahead of baseline inflation. Are you happy with that?? Anyone who believes Council will stem spending to recover this back to just baseline inflation during the last five years of the plan is living in Cloud Cuckoo Land but that is exactly what Dr Blakeley (and Council) asks us to believe. At the AGM Councillors with the exception of Clr Green seemed unable to grasp this issue or explain why our projections are wrong. [* Note: the Draft Annual Plan for 2007/08 now shows residential rates increasing by 4.7%, so we should at least be greatful for this small movement in the right direction.]

A recent paper written by Dr Blakeley and adopted by Council has three telling statements in it - “Cost pressures on Council are currently unsustainable” - “Council was alerted to fiscal situation early in 2005” - “Even a trading surplus by $5M would still place Porirua below the average for local authorities.” A 15% increase in rates would be required to create such a surplus. Of course Council could cut costs but what evidence from the past would give us any confidence they have the intestinal fortitude to do that? What is more disturbing is that there is no urgency to actually DO anything until the next LTCCP review in mid 2009. WRA have expressed concern that a majority sub-group of councillors caucused together on a regular basis. We therefore accept Clr Shaw’s assurance along with the other councillors, who are members of this group, that it is merely a discussion forum. Our concern would be lessened if all councillors, including our Mayor, were invited to these informal meetings. However, if this group is secretly deciding to block vote in a prearranged way as similar groups have done in the past, then it is a travesty of democracy and has no place in local authority governance (and that is no fairy tale as Clr Shaw suggests). Our next public meeting will be at St Mary’s Church starting at 7.30pm on Wednesday 23 May. The Whitby Village Plan is the main topic of discussion and is important to every household and resident. You are assured of an interesting meeting. Keep an eye on our notice board in the Whitby Mall

ken douglas appointment

1 May, 2007 Media Statement

New Chair at Whanganui DHB, new Deputy Chair at Capital & Coast DHB. Health Minister Pete Hodgson has announced the appointment of a new chair at Whanganui District Health Board (DHB) and a new deputy chair at Capital & Coast DHB. Pete Hodgson said he welcomed the appointments of Kate Joblin and Ken Douglas as chair and deputy chair of Whanganui and Capital & Coast DHBs respectively. Both Kate Joblin’s and Ken Douglas’ terms of office commence on 3 May 2007.

"Kate Joblin and Ken Douglas will bring substantial governance and managerial experience to their positions through their previous roles. I look forward to working with both of them to improve health outcomes for the residents of Capital & Coast and Wanganui," Pete Hodgson said.

Kate Joblin is a Wanganui-based self-employed chartered accountant. She has extensive senior management experience in both the private and public sectors. Kate Joblin is involved as a director in local health and education organisations in Wanganui and is currently an appointed member of Whanganui DHB. She is a director of Nazareth Rest Home Ltd, Quinlan Court Ltd, Whanganui City Health, Whanganui Accident and Medical Ltd, and Kate Joblin & Co Ltd. She also chairs Aubert Home of Compassion Ltd and is a trustee of ‘Life to the Max’.

Ken Douglas, ONZ JP, is an established company director with extensive experience in the management, governance and business areas. He was elected as a member of the Capital & Coast DHB in 2004. He has been a life long trade unionist. Over the last six years he has been an elected member of the Porirua City Council and director of several of New Zealand’s largest companies, including Air New Zealand and New Zealand Trade and Enterprise. He is currently chair of Positively Wellington Business and deputy chair of New Zealand Post. Pete Hodgson particularly thanked outgoing chair Dr Patrick O'Connor for his governance and hard work in heading Whanganui for the past two-and-a-half years and was pleased Dr O'Connor would continue to serve the people of Wanganui. "I acknowledge the efforts of Dr Patrick O’Connor and thank him for continuing on as a board member," Pete Hodgson says.

PLIMMERTON VILLAGE PLANNING – PROMENADE UPDATE

For those new to our community and for those who are tracking our progress, we enclose a very brief background on this project:

2001 PCC contracted the Isthmus Group to do scoping study of Plimmerton Village

2002 Indicative costings were developed for various projects but there was no implementation

2002 Local Government Act required a different approach to long term strategy and community consultation

 2003 -2004 Plimmerton Residents Association took the opportunity to conduct an extensive review of their community. 23 street meetings were held involving over 300 people. The PRA wanted  to determine what key factors people would like to see in a forward looking vision for Plimmerton. They needed to know they were making their best attempt at genuinely reflecting what people wanted. Information gathered was collated and fed back to the community for further input. Information about the community as gathered from the Census was factored in to community planning.

2004 Findings were presented to Council as The Plimmerton Promenade Project. In a nutshell at every meeting people expressed overwhelming concern that roading issues viz. traffic safety, flow , density and parking were paramount. They said that despite the very special character and atmosphere in the village that the streetscape was tired and run down. They asked for consistent design and planned development to permeate the whole community

2005 Consultation for possible Village Plans city wide began. Plimmerton requested a way forward to help achieve the vision. On going community consultation occured.

2006 Landscape architect , Louise Dunning was appointed to coordinate ideas and draw up concept plans with community groups. We submitted our applications for funding for Stage 1 – SH1 to the fire station. $400,000.00 was allocated by Council for this initial development.

2007 Stage 1 detailed design drawings were completed from the concept plans. Tenders were let and Works Infrastructure began Stage 1 implementation which is in progress. To this point there has been widespread consultation with some community members having attended over 80 meetings this far in the process. We have been able to

A Landscape architect has been contracted  by Council to draw up detail plans for planting and the entrance into Plimmerton.

The continuation of the Steyne Avenue fenceline is still being negotiated with Ontrack.

2007 For the 8th year we have continued working with Ontrack and the Greater Wellington Regional Council to provide both an underpass through to the Domain and improved parking. We have not been able to pursue an underpass from the school due to engineering concerns regarding flooding. However a continuation of an underpass from Steyne Avenue through to the Domain is the plan with extensive parking able to be developed on the other side. This we hope will enable parents to drop their children off safely on the Domain side, allowing them a wee walk round to school and avoid the need to use Steyne Avenue during peak times. It will also enable hugely increased area for park and ride. Here’s hoping the decision on this is not far off. GWRC have allocated the funding from this years budget.

Contributed by Helen Chipper

new dompost reporter for porirua

At some stage I will have to list the DomPost reporters who have worked in, or on, Porirua City. There is a long line of them, many in more senior postions new. It was a loss to our city when the Post closed its Hagley Street office. Here is the new one, and you can contact him with your news:

Hi Robert
Nice talking with you this afternoon. My contact details are below.
cheers
Dave Burgess
Reporter The Dominion Post 40 Boulcott St PO Box 3740 Wellington Phone: 474 0139 Fax: 474 0350 E-mail: dave.burgess@dompost.co.nz

plimmerton agm

Ian Athfield Athfield Architects Wellington

Dear Ian

Thanks so much for agreeing to be Guest Speaker at our Plimmerton Residents’ Assn AGM on the evening of Monday 28 May – we are truly delighted! We thought of you especially since there has been a little local fuss recently over the “gentrification” of Plimmerton, We’re keen to learn from you how we might blend the heritage and lifestyle of our traditional seaside village with inevitable change and modernity. Your fame and expertise for sensitivity to the physical environment in your architecture and urban design – and your promotion of “neighbourliness” – are all reasons why we’re sure you can help guide us. If you agree I suggest you could give us a brief talk on some relevant issues – say 15 minutes – and then we might invite questions from the floor for further discussion. I’ll be chairing the meeting which will start at 7.30pm in the Plimmerton Pavilion (opposite the Fire Station). Please email or phone me with any queries. We look forward to seeing you here in Plimmerton on Monday 28 May.
Warm regards Tim Sheppard For Plimmerton Residents’ Assn Inc.

election campaign - whitby

From: Robert Shaw

To: JIm.Dearsly

Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:07 PM

Subject: Re: WRA - Public Meeting - Whitby Plan and other matters

Jim this is rather obviously a campaign meeting.
r


JIm.Dearsly wrote:

 

Dear Mayor and N. Ward Councillors,

On behalf of the WRA committee, I invite you to attend a public meeting on 23 May starting at 7.30pm in St Mary's Church, Whitby shopping centre.

The main purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Whitby Village Plan. From Thursday this week we have a display of information seeking input and ideas. In the week prior to the meeting we will have the display manned to encourage participation in the process and attendance at the meeting. This is clearly a beginning and more communication and meetings will follow over the next few months.

 

John Green has been asked to talk to us about the issues ahead for Porirua and Whitby from his viewpoint as a councillor. John has been a great connect for the WRA and has been in touch with Whitby matters over many years.

Tim Shepherds of PRA is also talking to us on Plimmerton issues and in particular those we have in common with other RAs.

 

I believe it will be an interesting meeting and one where other councillors along with residents can contribute to discussion.

 

The invitation to attend it also extended to other PCC Councillors and copy addressees.

 

Regards to all

Jim

police action

council recovering costs issue

Tim  I was not questioning your right to ask elected members the question,
and indeed I applaud such an active interest in Council affairs by people
such as yourself.
 
I was responding to your use of words like "rubber stamping" by Councillors,
"PCC charges are not soundly or logically based", and "I don't think there
is a very professional process". That goes a lot further than asking
questions-you are making some value judgments, and you are entitled to
express your opinion if that is what you feel, but  don't expect me not to
react if you make those kind of statements without having your facts right.
 
I agree with your comments on  water meters.  You may have noticed the
comment by the Porirua Citizens' Group in its submission on the Rating
Inquiry (now available on the PCC website):
 
 " The implementation of full environmental cost pricing would require both
metering of water supplies and agreement on a methodology for charging for
waste water, as well as developing acceptable methodology for determining
and valuing the negative impact on the environment of waste water.  Further
issues would include determining how the "excess" revenue would be applied,
public resistance to charging for water services and how to deal with equity
issues - for example the impact on low income households.

 " There is already a well-documented relationship between charging and
demand for water.  Typically, charging for water by meter reduces demand by
something in the order of 20% to 30%.  That is, if people are aware of the
costs of the use of water, they are likely to be more careful and less
wasteful.  It would fit well with the statutory responsibility which local
authorities now have for promoting community wellbeing, including
environmental wellbeing, to use a full environmental cost pricing approach.


 " There would be a significant cost of installing water meters for many
local authorities.  However, this would be expected to be a relatively
short-term impact, because the cost would be offset by reduced capital
expenditure on new infrastructure in the medium to long term, as pricing
reduces growth in demand " .  

Regards, 
Roger

Roger Blakeley 
Chief Executive 
Porirua City Council 
Phone: +64 4 237 1401 

rate issues

April 16, 2007

BOLD MOVE REQUIRED ON RATES SAYS STEERING GROUP

A top level Porirua Steering group into rates says the current system of funding local authorities is “fatally flawed” and that a new system based on Central Government income tax or GST should be introduced.

“We know this is a radical approach, but the days of property tax are over,” says Steering Group member and former Porirua City Council CE John Seddon.

The group took the position that while the current property tax may have been appropriate in the pioneering days of the country, now that the services of local government were directed towards people, not property, it no longer made sense to tax property and not people.

The six member Steering Group comprised John Seddon, Trevor Roberts, John Watson, Margaret Guthrie, Alan Gray and Porirua Mayor Jenny Brash.

The group was set up late last year to canvass local opinion on the current rating-based system, look at alternatives and prepare a submission for the Government Inquiry into Local Body funding.

A member of the group, Mr Trevor Roberts said public feedback through submissions strongly supported the view that the current property tax-based system was neither fair nor affordable; that the current rating system did not meet the normal tests for taxation of efficiency, simplicity, transparency, sustainability and fairness, and that improvements were needed.

In a report prepared for the Independent Rating Inquiry set up by Government, the Steering Group says it is clear the focus of local government has been considerably widened over the years and is now much wider than just “flood protection, transportation, refuse disposal and drinkable water supplies.”

Much of what councils did now was people related and therefore it made sense the funding system reflected this.

To this end, the Steering Group said local authorities should be funded either through Central Government income tax or GST and that the new system be phased in over a number of years.

The Group was open minded about how the general revenue should be allocated.

It said the revenue sharing mechanism should have certainty, independence and backed by legislation.

Mr Roberts said the Group had not taken a position on whether the general revenue sharing should be through income tax or GST. Both had advantages.

The Group also recommended among other things that:

The Steering Group’s full report has been forwarded to the Independent Inquiry for consideration.

labour's mayoral candidate

Watch for the Labour Party to announce Selwyn Katene as their mayoral candidate.You read it first on the Porirua Wellington Web Blog. This has implications for mayoral candidate Liz Kelly who is from the same marae.
r
Thursday, April 12, 2007

information evening - plan change

all the best for easter everyone

All the best for Easter everyone. Great weather in Porirua City. The roads seem to be working far better than in previous years. I have spent some of Easter developing a website for another organisation that takes my time. Check out The Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
r
Sunday, April 8, 2007

FEES AND CHARGES

Dear Councillors

You’ll probably have seen today’s Sunday Star-Times with a list of all Council charges for a LIM report. PCC charges one of the lowest fees for this service – so much lower than most councils that I seriously question whether Porirua is recovering the basic costs involved.

Please could I ask that all user fees and charges be reviewed in depth to ensure there is no cross-subsidisation from rates and that they reflect fully the inherent market signals which they are meant to? It seems PCC charges property owners only $120 for a LIM report whereas adjacent councils charge $300 (Wellington and Hutt) and $220 (Kapiti). The discrepancy is so large that one must infer either that all the others are grossly over-charging or PCC is not covering costs.

I’d like to bet it’s the latter – and that means that the general ratepayer is subsidising pointlessly the purchasers of LIM reports. I’ve often talked to you before about user fees and charges and my feeling is that many other PCC charges are not soundly or logically based. The impression I have is that Council simply rubber-stamps each year the fees suggested by officers and these suggestions are largely based on whatever fees had been charged the previous year. I don’t think that’s a very professional process and I urge you to undertake a comprehensive and in-depth review of all charges – including consideration of other potential areas for the introduction of user fees. Just as one example I suggest it is time to encourage more widespread use of water meters so that everyone has an awareness of the real cost of cleaning their big SUVs twice a week; filling their spa pools; watering their fancy gardens, etc.

Regards Tim Sheppard

ROBERT COMMENTS

Always nice to hear from Tim. I will check out the history of the LIM report costs, but I think there is a reason why we are on the low side.

In the meeting round before last Council adjusted fees and charges. This is a regular action over the whole range of charges. The advice from the officers was actually not accepted first by myself as chairperson, and then by the Committee itself. And, then again at the full council meeting when I moved the recommendation of the committee, this was itself adjusted.It is usual to have strong debate about the level of fees and charges.

Regarding the sound and logical base for fees and charges: this is what is worked out by each council in its formal funding policy. There are certain factors that have to be considered by law (eg the principle of "user pays" was a controversial principle in Porirua City). Some of the services provided by council are full cost recovery and others are at different percentage recoveries.

There were two main points that I made during the debate. First, Council must always adjust its charges in line with inflation. Councillors can prefer to take the easy path and not put up charges. This was the case in our Council until quite recently, and it had several bad effects - but they have been rectifed now. We are keeping up with inflation as it happens. Second, Counckl must try to maintain the comparability between charges that has evolved. This second matter is about not bringing about unexpected effects. For example, if you put the cost of tailors at the landfill up and keep the cost of cars the same, everyone turns up with their rubbish in their cars. If there is a charge for inorganic collections - rubbish is dumped everywhere.

One area where Porirua City's charges are higher than most places (particularly other cities in our region) is in the development levies imposed on developers of land. We have consistently taken a very hard line with developers and some will remember this landing us in Court recently (where we won). I believe we need to maintain very high standards in the provision of services to new subdivisions and this entails the development and protection of our green areas and the provision of infrastructure of all kinds. This is in contrast to the approach taken to the ordinary person who wants to buy a house in our City (more on the LIM charges when I have the data).

The imposition of water meters on the city is an interesting idea. The regional council is working towards this policy for us all. They visited your Council about nine months ago and set out their views. Also, the Wellington Regional Strategy gave a push to the idea of universal water meters. Actually, the policy is absurd for our situation. Wellington takes its water from rivers that flow, and we do not have dams. Some people will remember Bill Taylor's petition that I supported. It opposed water meters over a decade ago (see detail below).

Thanks to Tim for his thoughts, and regards to all. Comments welcome as usual.
r

JOHN WATSON PROVIDES DETAILS ON THE WATER METER PETITION THAT I HAD FORGOTTEN

It was Bill Taylor and John Watson who presented the petition. I was by that time on the Council. Bill was a councillor for Pukerua Bay although he retired from that position when Pukerua Bay was merged with Plimmerton. The northern ward was then much of the old Taupo ward and Pukerua Bay. Bill had a golf business at Paraparaumu and then bookshops in Tawa and elsewhere. He was also an important figure in the Pukeura Bay RSA. He is now retired at the Wairarapa. As John writes:

"We collected 3,713 signatures and the petition was presented to then CEO John Seddon in your presence by Bill Taylor and myself. "

The wording of the petition was:

TIM ASKS FOR MORE DETAIL ABOUT WHY THE IDEA OF WATER METERS IS A "NO GO"

Basically, you need to check out the special Act of Parliament that we have for Wellington's water supply. It has good features and bad features. Also, look at the business plan of GW for water. We are in a particularly fortunate position regarding our water supply. I will write more about this when time permits. It is my turn to cook dinner and I am being told to attend to that matter. Water is a worthwhile topic to discuss. Thanks Tim.
r

INFORMATION FROM PCC

 Tim
 
David Rolfe has provided the following comment on LIM charges.The cost of
providing a LIM is not reflected in the charge that Council makes. The
difficulty arises in how the true cost of providing a LIM is calculated. To
ascertain this would need a complex financial recording system that we do
not have. The cost of LIMs has been calculated on what is a "reasonable"
price that will encourage prospective house purchasers to apply for a LIM.
It is not a statutory requirement to obtain a LIM to accompany a house
purchase contract but it is strongly recommended. Having prospective house
purchasers obtain a LIM has advantages for the Council as frequently the
existance of illegal or unauthorised works becomes apparent. For this reason
Council has encouraged LIMs to be sought as this has a beneficial "public
good" aspect and the existence of this check of making sure that no illegal
works exist on a property has huge beneficial hidden financial advantages
for the Council of achieving compliance with building consent requirements .

 
A report is being prepared for the next Committee round on ERS fees and
charges and the cost of LIMs will be included. Comparisons can be misleading
as some of those other local authorities may recently have increased their
fees. 
 
Council's policy on fees can be found in the Long Term Council Community
Plan  , page 222 as part of the Revenue and Financing Policy. This was
agreed by Council after public consultation.  Our fees and charges are
regularly reviewed and reported to Council.  With respect, you do a
disservice to Council in suggesting that review of fees and charges is a
process of "rubber stamping" officers' advice. Neither am I impressed with
your allegations of lack of professionalism in the process or that PCC
charges are not soundly or logically based!  That is simply not true.
 
I hope this is helpful in answering your question.
 
Regards, Roger   

Roger Blakeley 
Chief Executive 
Porirua City Counci


TIM REPLIES

democracy

A recent story in a local newspaper proves how short are the memories of people. It says democracy has lessened in the council recently. I will not bother with a reply, but the truth is the exact opposite of that.

Those interested in current debate about the nature of democracy (and particularly citizenship) might be interested in a paper I wrote recently and a chapter for a UK book on the subject.

Robert's paper on democracy

Robert's book chapter on democracy

THAT DID NOT TAKE LONG - I AM ASKED WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMS IN THE COUNCIL BEFORE WE ALTERED OUR STRUCTURES

no change to the number of councillors

We have received the determination made by the Local Government Commission
setting out how Porirua City Council's representation will be made up at the
2007 local authority elections.  A copy of their full determination is
attached. 

 

In summary, the Local Government Commission has determined that for the
general election of the Porirua City Council, to be held on 13 October 2007,
the following representation arrangements will apply:

 

1)         Porirua City shall be divided into three wards. 

 

2)         Those three wards shall be:

 

            a)         the Northern Ward, comprising the area delineated on
SO Plan SO373881 deposited with Land Information New Zealand;

 

            b)         the Western Ward, comprising the area delineated on
SO Plan SO37895 deposited with Land Information New Zealand;

 

            c)         the Eastern Ward, comprising the area delineated on
SO Plan SO37882 deposited with Land Information New Zealand.

 

3)         Part of Ranui Heights will be transferred from the Eastern Ward
to the Western Ward to allow both wards to retain their current level of
representation (five and three councillors respectively) and comply with the
± 10% rule. The area concerned comprises 14 meshblocks and lies generally
between State Highway 1, Mungavin Avenue, Awatea Street and part of Arawhata
Street to a point before its junction with Marua Place, then running south
to the boundary with Wellington City. 

 
4)         The Council shall comprise the Mayor and 13 Councillors, elected
as follows:

            a)         5 councillors elected by the electors of the Northern
Ward;

            b)         3 councillors elected by the electors of the Western
Ward;

            c)         5 councillors elected by the electors of the Eastern
Ward;

5)         The Local Government Commission decided against establishing a
Titahi Bay Community Board at this time.

meeting notes

Plimmerton Residents’ Association Inc

Minutes of Meeting
held at Plimmerton Pavilion
on Monday, 26 February 2007 at 7.30pm

Present: Pip Piper Y
Meryl Harwood (Treasurer) N
Diane Sprowell (Secretary) Y
Helen Chipper Y
John Lambie (Chairperson) Y
Tim Sheppard Y
George McNeillage N
Barry Cook Y
Dave Anderson Y
Mescal Bradey N
David Sperry N
Sandra Werner N

Councillors: Euon Murrell Y
Maureen Gillon Y
Robert Shaw Y
John Green N
Sue Dow N

GWRC: Margaret Shields

Visitors: Pat Piper, Russell Black & Kevin Millard

1. Greetings
John Lambie (Chair) welcomed everyone to the meeting.
2. Apologies
Meryl Harwood, David Sperry, Sandra Werner & John Green
3. Committee Secretarial Function
Kevin Millard, a local Plimmerton resident has kindly agreed to take on the secretarial duties while Diane Sprowell takes some time out from the role.

4. Notice of any General Business items for end of meeting
Nil
5. Adoption of Minutes of Meeting held on 29 January 2007
Moved: HC Seconded: TS
6. Matters arising from minutes from previous meeting and report backs:
Village Strategy Final Plans
A meeting was held with Gordana Savic (PCC Officer) attended by RB & PP. RB provided a further copy of the Russell Kearse report re disabled access. Draft working drawings are available for Stage 1A from Plimmerton entrance to Queen/Bath Street. Now working on getting detail right and RB has consulted with Linda Kirkmeester and Carolyn Wallace (Aquavilla Bed & Breakfast). Gordana has now addressed a number of the items raised by RB who has no concerns at this stage and expects revised drawings by end of the week for signing off. RB asked how PRA would handle the sign off of the plans. HC suggested that we need a proper process for sign off and suggested that the PRA Committee authorises Russell Black to approve final plans on PRA behalf.

Moved: HC Seconded: TS Agreed unanimously.
HC thanked RB on behalf of the Committee for his efforts. The tender has been let and work is expected to begin next week.

PP advised there is a meeting next Monday re all Village strategies.

Art Trail

No progress as Darcy Nicholas away – have not been able to make a time to meet with him. HC advised a Committee is being formed to progress this project.

Report Backs:
Combined RA Meeting in Whitby
TS, PP & HC attended a meeting in Whitby to discuss the upcoming local body elections. Jim Dearsly is to write a letter on behalf of combined RAs to formally express interest in next election.

TS reported that the RAs want to see real competition for the various wards and invitations to all candidates would be issued to find out what their views are on various issues prior to the elections. Financial issues seen to be a major issue – back to basics approach seen to be necessary. Strong support for independent candidates (not affiliated to a political party).

MS (GWRC) advised that a decision is expected next month regarding combined constituency in regard to the Regional Council rather than having area representatives. If this eventuates, GWRC Councillors may be reduced in number.

Pole replacement on beach

Still waiting for response from GWRC re letter to Vector.

Regional Transport Strategy & Public Transport Plans
TS confirmed submission was lodged.

SH1 Upgrade Review
Draft Terms of Reference document was not accepted by Transit (Graham Taylor) – counter proposal awaited.

Commuter Carpark, Pedestrian Access & Mainline Steam
TS circulated emails to Committee prior to meeting. Advised that joint meeting to be held on 2 March involving all parties. It is hoped that this will lead to progress. Mainline Steam to be approached re plans for new building.

The issue of Plimmerton Station was discussed, particularly its future use – heritage building? Owner of building won’t spend any money on it – plan to replace with a modern structure. MS suggested we talk to John Porter at Paekakariki re utilisation of rail buildings and/or Euon McQueen (ex GWRC) who is still involved in rail issues. Important not to give building away until options for its future use are fully explored. Need a concrete proposal and commitment. TS undertook to report back at next meeting.

BC asked if new building south of Carhoots was to be notified. This was not known.

7 Steyne Avenue - Upgrade
Pleasing to see upgrade work being undertaken on flats including new cladding, windows, fire upgrade. Owners have 2 years to complete upgrade, but expect to complete it in 4-5 months. HC said that if Committee members receive complaints about noise etc while the upgrade work is in progress, need to reassure people that it is short term and will result in a safer, more attractive building in the village.

7. PRA Participation into enquiry into funding for Local Government Services
Public Discussion document was circulated to all residents by PCC. A brainstorming meeting is scheduled for 27th February at Pataka. After the meeting PRA will need to develop submission to PCC – what we would like them to say for their lead submission. PRA will also make a submission to Government – TS suggested Committee has an interim meeting to formulate submission, then circulate to Community database members for comment and input.

RS felt that Steering Group should make their own submission. Discussion followed on this issue.

Date for special Committee meeting – Sunday, 4th March at 10.00am at Tim’s house (78 Cluny Road).

8. Update – Resource Consent – 5 Sunset Parade
EM advised 79 submissions received (3 for). Application has been withdrawn temporarily to reassess his options. If developer comes back with revised proposal, consultation would take place with people making submissions.

PP reiterated need to put suburban review on high priority. PP asked PCC Councillors to re-prioritise suburban review. HC discussed with Russell Plume the rural review which has started which encompasses 80% of Porirua. Asked if PRA had been consulted – large rural area within Plimmerton. HC thinks we do not have the big picture, timeframes, consultation periods etc. Councillors agree that review of District Plan should proceed urgently. RS described the process to date. District Plan Strategy document being developed – expected to be completed by the end of 2007. MS thinks there is not enough consideration of what communities want. MG said that the Village Strategies began from the Mana upgrade and the perceived lack of community. Was based on Plimmerton model.

RS suggested we invite a Council Officer to a PRA meeting to discuss District Plan process. May help to progress issue. Written request to be sent to Roger Blakeley for the appropriate Council Officer to attend.

9. Heritage Review Project
Council Officer to be invited to attend next meeting to give an update.

10. Council Elections – 2007
Covered earlier in meeting.

11. PCC Councillors – Feedback on current issues
Euon Murrell –

§ Mainline Steam – advised that PCC expressed concerns on behalf of PRA.
§ Discussed attendance of Councillors at Council meetings and pros and cons of daytime vs evening meetings. Public forum is available before every evening meeting. Feels that daytime meetings are of a better quality and more productive – also suits Council Officers. EM stressed that Council workshops are now open to the public and there is a public forum available at the beginning of every evening meeting. There is also a strong move for all workshops to be open to public.

Maureen Gillon

§ No particular issues.

Robert Shaw

All issues covered during earlier part of meeting.

TS commented that the report from the PCC CEO on the process for review of cost and revenue structures for Council into the future was a very important, professional and well-structured paper. EM reported that whole management review of Council was almost completed.

12. Financial Report (MH)
HC presented financial report on MH behalf.
Moved HC Seconded JL Accepted unanimously.

13. Correspondence (accepted as tabled)
Inwards
§ Letter PCC dated 15 February 2007 re Pauatahanui Soldiers’ Memorial
§ PCOSS Panui Newsletter – February 2007
§ Letter PCC dated 16 February 2007 re Village Work Plan Planning Meeting on 5 March
§ Copy of Letter from Peter Evans to PCC dated 16 February 2007 re Seawall Damage

Outwards
§ Thank you letter to Claire Toynbee dated 9 February 2007
§ Community Database Email #19 re Rates Enquiry Meeting – 27 February at Pataka
§ Copy of Submission to PCC re land use at 5 Sunset Parade

14. News & Views & Monthly Newsletter (DS)
April issue. DS to begin preparation. Dave to assist DS with contacting advertisers. Committee asked to think about contributions. Need to use issue to lead into AGM in May. Agreed to defer producing newsletters until after the AGM – reassess then.

15. General Business
§ Speaker for AGM - Committee to bring ideas to next meeting.

§ Invitation received to the launch of Porirua Community Appeal Trust fundraising for new Porirua Sports & Events Centre. – 8 March – 5.30pm

16. Next Meeting Date:
26 March 2007 – Chairperson: Meryl Harwood

Meeting Closed at: 09.10 pm

Minutes taken by Diane Sprowell, Secretary

plimmerton village strategy progress

Good Morning

The following provides details of the current issues and the actions taken
to resolve them. Note I expect that there will be other issues as this is
the nature of village projects with high levels of community involvement. It
is important that community's expectations be achieved by these projects
because they are primary generators of the concepts and ideas. This also
means the Village projects have greater demands for consultation than other
projects that we would normally carry out.

There are two issues that were identified on Monday.

1	Decorative finish on thresholds, and
2	Landscape Planting

1  Decorative finish on Thresholds
	The concept plans showed a wave pattern as the decorative finish on
the thresholds. This was transferred into the final construction
drawings. The community representatives have expressed a wish that a 	fish
pattern now be used. This was an idea that was put forward in the
initial concept stage. Council officers thought that the idea had been
translated into a wave pattern the residents expected that there would 	be
further discussion at the final design stage. 
	
	The fish pattern is now being explored to see if it can be
practically 	implemented.

2	Landscape Planting
	The representatives of the Community were expecting Council to
design 	the planting and the Council officer had expected more details from
the Community Representatives before carrying out the design. This
misunderstand was identified on Monday and resolved. The planting
design is now going ahead. There is also some technical issues,
related to 	the electricity act, that limit the types of planting that
can 	go around power poles. This issue is now understood by both
parties.

Regards,


Peter Bailey

General Manager Utilities Policy
Porirua City Council
Cobham Court
PO Box 50-218
Porirua City
Wednesday March 28, 2007

from the left

coastal highway group media release

Kerry Prendergast has got it right

Kerry Prendergast is quite right in stating that Transmission Gully is unaffordable.  It is time for other local politicians to stop fooling the public with the promise of an unaffordable highway which would bring very little benefit to the region.

On present estimates there is a funding gap of $500 million.  Do the local MP’s believe that a Minister of Finance will come up with that sort of money?  Obviously the more pressing needs of Auckland will get priority.

So the only way the dream highway can be financed is by a hefty increase in regional rates.  Does Kapiti Mayoral hopeful Chris Turver favour such an increase which will fall heavily on Kapiti ratepayers?    Mr Turver is like a cracked record when he says that Transmission Gully can be completed in ten years.  He was saying exactly the same thing ten years ago and nothing has happened.  No doubt he will still be prattling in the same vein in ten years time and unless there is a change of thinking still nothing will have happened.

Peter Dunne has also joined the chorus and suggests that the coastal scheme is daft.  It is Peter Dunne who is daft if he thinks spending a huge amount on one monster project at the expense of any other roading developments will improve Wellington’s economic performance. 

Peter Dunne should come and take a look at the work being done to widen the coastal road in preparation for extensions to the safety fence.  This work has shown how simple it would be to add one or two more lanes without any significant environmental effects.  The widening is happening now and shows how it can be done without major interruptions to traffic flows.

Kerry Prendergast is the voice of common sense.  Other local politicians should stop saying what they think the public want to hear and start facing the facts.  Transmission Gully is certainly unaffordable without imposing an unacceptable tax hike on already overburdened ratepayers.  And the huge outlay would be much better spent on other projects including further upgrading of centennial highway.
Saturday March 24, 2007

fairy tales from duck creek

Over a year ago I became the chairperson of one of the Council’s two decision-making committees. Now to understand what I am about to tell you, you need to know a little about how the council actually works.

Anything that is decided by the Council is first developed as advice by the officers. They present their advice to the chairperson of the appropriate committee.  Having considered the officer’ advice the chairperson makes a recommendation to the committee. The committee then meets and the chairperson moves their recommendation as a motion, and way the debate goes.

Perhaps the most intense meetings at the council are those between the chairperson and the officers. I have changed and rejected officers’ recommendations. The result has been some re-focusing of the Council. The number of motions has been reduced dramatically, and there has been a much more firm distinction between governance and management.

Now when the recommendations of the chairperson were published before the meeting, the councillors had questions. Why did I recommend this, and not that? Can they do this? They began to telephone me, and there was a steady stream of them that I invited to my house to talk through issues. This went on for quite a while – whenever there was a new agenda.

It seemed sensible for those interested to meet at the same time and discuss things.  There evolved the habit of having a meeting in the weekend prior to the council meeting. Quite often when people did not agree with my recommendation I would suggest how they might frame an amendment to achieve what they wanted without upsetting the flow of decision-making.  This works fine. The majority vote subsequently decides the issue at the council table. No one committed themselves to any position in advance of the meeting. People had a chance to get their own ideas straight. You have to expect a divergence of opinion on a council.

So what has this to do with fairy tales from Duck Creek? It is just that last night, at a meeting in Whitby, I met about 30 people all convinced that these meetings were some kind of evil.

What a change for me: for most of my career on councils (city and regional) I have been accused of being a loner and too far apart from my councillor colleagues. “Robert, you have to learn to work with other people” they all said. Now, evidently, I am part of a conspiracy.

I am sorry the truth is so dull. Fact is, I think it a good idea that the councillors talk together and learn about the decisions they have to make. The quality of meetings depends on the quality of preparation by the participants. But, in the hands of those who want to find a conspiracy- to hang councillors - it is dynamite, or so they say in the dark depths of dank Duck Creek.
r
Thursday, 15 March 2007

management side - review

Date: March 18, 2007

Fax: (04) 237 1405
Tel:  (04) 237 5089

A review is underway into Council’s processes, systems, structures and organisational capacity, says Porirua City Council Chief Executive Dr Roger Blakeley.

“The primary focus is not cost cutting  ... it’s about improving the way we go about our business, about our capabilities and how we deliver services.

“One of the thrusts of the review is to improve asset management planning in the area of utilities, parks and open spaces and buildings. This is an area that covers more than half of Council’s expenditure.

“We also need to improve our operational processes with the goal of operational excellence, and to improve our front line service to customers.

“We also need to ensure Council is on a sustainable financial pathway into the future. We are under pressure from all quarters to provide services, but we also recognise that our ratepayers are highly rated.”

Dr Blakeley said consultants had produced a proposal which was presented to all staff last week.  Staff had been invited to comment on this proposal by April 5.

No decisions had been made on structuring at this stage. It was therefore too early to comment on the issue of potential redundancies.

“Certainly the proposal before us is designed to be fiscally neutral in the short term and provide medium to long term efficiency gains.”

Dr Blakeley said he expected the report to be finalised late April.

reply to whitby residents' association

In an earlier blog I gave some of the analysis of meeting performance over the last year. Here is a little more that I am looking at right now. I thought my motions were more frequently overturned, but apparently not. Well I remember my motions on the stage and the Sister Cities Committee not being accepted, but it is possible I did not formally move them because of opposition.
r
Saturday, March 10, 2007

$2 million for sports and events centre trust

March 9, 2007

$2 MILLION GRANT TOWARDS NEW SPORTS AND EVENTS CENTRE

The Mana Community Grants Foundation has committed $2 million towards the cost of building the new Sports and Events Centre in Porirua City.

“This is a massive help; an exceedingly fine thing to do for the community,” said David Oughton, chair of a trust just established to help raise funds from the private sector for the new Centre.

The commitment was announced by Foundation chair and well known local businessman John Burke.

Mr Burke said the foundation was very pleased to be able to make the commitment because “every dollar spent on a community facility like this is a dollar the taxpayer will not have to spend later on the Department of Courts, the Department of Justice and the Department of Police.”

The amount will be paid out in $500,000 annual instalments over the next four years to meet guidelines set down by the Department of Internal Affairs, and cash flows.

Mr Burke said the Porirua Licensing Trust made a grant of $125,000 towards the current Recreation Centre some years ago based on the same principle: that a dollar well spent now would mean many dollars saved later.

At that time the $125,000 represented around 35% of the building’s cost.

More than 120 people gathered last night at the Recreaction Centre to attend the launch of the Porirua Community Appeal Trust.

The trust is charged with raising funds from the private sector to help fund the new Sports and Events Centre.

The trust is headed by retired senior government department head David Oughton and includes Cathy Roa, former Kapi-Mana Netball Association President and current board member, Ngati Toa kaumatua Thom Kenny, local businessman David Wilson, former All Black Graham Mourie, former long time city councillor Kevin Watson and businesswoman Gagau Annandale-Stone.

The new Sports and Events Centre will cost $17.5 million.  Six and a half million dollars of this will come from the proceeds of the sale of the Aotea Block. The new trust has a target to reduce the balance ($11 million) by a further $6 million – which is now down to $4 million.

Mr Oughton said today that the $2 million commitment from the Mana Community Grants Foundation was exceedingly generous and would provide his trust team with a significant start.

“The challenge has been set and it is now up to us. We have a very good story to tell ... that this is an excellent opportunity for companies to invest in a very positive way in their community.”

The Trust will operate separately from Council.

$150,000 for a new project

In the Draft Annual Plan there is a sum of money to patch up the Pataka roof. It must be done, because it leaks. My problem is that the request for this money comes to us at all. There is already a sum of money to maintain assets. Evidently, it is insufficient. What is that sum I wonder? What are the other priorities for it? Give me the list and a red pen and I will keep the item within budget. And, we would not need to consider increasing the budget category by $150K - which will stay there year after year.
r
Friday, March 9, 2007

village logos

Some suburbs / villages have logos and others do not. The question is asked, would logos help to embed identity?
r
Friday, March 9, 2007

whitby dog exercise facility

Work is going on to get this patch established. The survey showed good support for the idea, but we are having trouble finding the $30,000.

r
Thursday, March 8, 2007

submission on rates from plimmerton

Plimmerton Residents’ Association Inc.
P O Box 57-027, MANA

9 March 2007Porirua Steering Group on Rating Inquiry
c/- Porirua City Council.

Rates and Local Authority Funding Inquiry

This provisional submission to the Porirua Steering Group comes from the Committee of the Plimmerton Residents’ Association Inc. Owing to the short lead-time for submissions to the Porirua Steering Group we have not yet been able to survey the wider Plimmerton community but will do so before finalising our direct submission to the Government Inquiry into Local Government Funding (“the Shand Inquiry”) in April.The PRA Committee is strongly opposed to the historical and grossly inequitable property-based rating system and supports the consensus view of the public meeting held at Pataka on 27 February that local government funding should largely be sourced from income and company taxation. We are aware that such a change would not be easy, nor readily accepted by either central or local government, but we urge the Porirua Steering Group to bring the strongest pressure to bear in support of such a move. With the clear and considered conclusions of the Porirua Steering Group, comprising representatives from all major community stakeholders, our Porirua City Council must firmly endorse the same approach and pro-actively promote it with both the Shand Inquiry and directly with central government.Even though we are fully persuaded of the desirability of change we cannot ignore the possibility that the strong lobby groups of LGNZ, SOLGM etc might succeed in blocking change with self-serving opposition. (They don’t want to lose the power of levying ever-increasing local rates.) Therefore, and without lessening the strength of our belief in the need for change to income tax funding, we also comment below on some relatively minor changes to the current rates revenue mechanism (as per your useful public discussion document).

1. Rates Are Grossly Unfair

The Porirua Steering Group is well aware of the many arguments against the property rating system. Among those that the PRA Committee find the most compelling are:

1. the nexus between property ownership and most local government services is attenuated at best;

2. most services and costs relate to the number of people using them, not the number of dwellings, yet there are many householders who contribute nothing and no adjustment is made for the number of residents in a house;

3. the rates basis of property valuation discriminates against long-term owners (compared to speculative investors) – essentially for most people it is an unrealised capital gains tax;

4. the rapid rise in property valuations has made it easier for Councils to justify rapidly rising rates;

5. aggregate rates are becoming increasingly unaffordable, especially by pensioners living in their old family homes;

6. distributional inequities are compounding for those whose properties are rising in value faster than average: they are not only paying higher rates in absolute terms, they are also paying an increasing share of total city rates (ie increasing cross-subsidisation).

2. Income Tax Is Fairer

It is understandable that nobody likes paying any form of rates or taxation, but our appreciation is that rates are disliked much more than the system of income tax. That is seen as relatively fair. Almost everyone who is a property owner, and so a ratepayer, also pays income tax, so our preference for the latter system of collecting funds for general local government services is not a simplistic ploy to try and avoid paying anything. Indeed, high income earners (who are mostly the same as wealthy property owners) will continue to pay more than those on low incomes, while pensioners, beneficiaries, the unwaged and others will generally pay nothing – a big plus on the current situation for many people.
We are conscious of the fact that LGNZ, SOLGM (and no doubt others) argue that rates are easy to collect (even by 80 different agencies!) and that changing from a local to a national tax collection system would undermine local democracy. We disagree. Inland Revenue is a very efficient tax collector and it would be even easier (and cheaper) for them to collect funds for local government services than it is now for Councils to collect property-based rates. Administratively it would also seem straightforward for IRD to distribute the funds to local bodies, as they do already (indirectly) for regional agencies such as District Health Boards. Nor are we persuaded that we would lose local autonomy by a change to income tax funding. We do not place great store by the fact that our local council collects funding from us for their services, rather than it being collected centrally as part of our income tax. Nor do we see there being a problem of *confusion* coming from alleged *dual accountability*. Rather we suspect the LGNZ and SOLGM arguments are self-serving to protect their own vested interests and rating authority.

1. Allocation

How should revenue collected nationally through the income tax system be allocated to the 80 or so local authorities? There are some issues here which will need to be studied carefully.
As a simple starting point we believe most funds should be allocated on a population basis. (NB for Porirua Steering Group: please ensure PCC is reminded that their revenue per capita is only 76% of the average, so a change from rates to income tax should strongly benefit Porirua. Any councillor fighting a rearguard action for rates should be told they are not acting in our best interests – the city as a whole would clearly be better off with an income tax basis for funding.)
However, we acknowledge that things are not all that simple. Some councils have substantial non-rates revenue; others do not. How should we allow for those differences?
We are provisionally attracted to the idea of most funds being distributed on a capitation basis, with the remaining funds collected being available on a national tender basis according to individual council needs (eg for large essential projects). In our opinion we currently have a “wants” driven Council rather than a “needs” driven one. That is what we must change, nationwide. We simply don’t cut our coat according to our cloth – and we must. “Back to Basics” should be our catch-cry!
There is also the need for Councils to collect user fees to cover the costs of specific local services; eg rubbish collection; landfill usage; dog registration; hire of premises, etc. Not only should Councils be allowed to continue this practice, but they should be specifically incentivised to recoup as many specific costs as feasible, thus reducing their real need for general, unspecified “rates” revenue.

3. Other Possibilities for Revenue Mechanisms

1. GST

Economists would argue (as they did on its introduction 20 years ago) that GST is more efficient and equitable since it cannot be avoided as *easily* as income tax. But note GST is not a *progressive* tax and politically that’s not popular these days. Also, only end-users pay GST (without being able to claim it back), so what about businesses: would they be exempt from contributing to the cost of local govt services? Overall we would prefer income tax to fund local government, but if income tax were not acceptable, GST would still be better than property rates.

2. 24/7 Road Pricing

This might not be currently practicable but seems worth keeping on the radar screen.

3. Regional Petrol Tax

Petrol is already heavily taxed, theoretically for roading purposes. The nexus between petrol usage and roading costs is clear and acceptable, but we would not support increased petrol tax to fund other unrelated services and functions.

4. Regional Payroll Tax for Public Transport

We strongly support public transport and (as we have submitted to GWRC on their Draft Passenger Transport Plan) accept the argument that the wider community should fund the capital infrastructure involved. We do not agree however that that argument applies to ongoing fare subsidies and nor do we accept that businesses should be lumbered with a payroll tax for such subsidies. That would be clearly counter-productive and would lessen business efficiency.

5. Full Environmental Cost Pricing for Water Services

Yes! This makes sense economically and environmentally. We disagree with the discussion paper’s comment that “There may be concerns about its impact on low income households”. Everybody has to pay the same price for food and power – why is water different? Water metering at each point of usage should be required, just as we have for other utilities.

6. Green Taxes

The cynics amongst us suggest these could be used simply as another excuse to line government coffers and expand the bureaucracy! Certainly they would need careful analysis with strict scientific methodology.

7. Bed Taxes

While there might possibly be some small logic in considering a tourist bed tax in Queenstown, Rotorua or even Auckland, for most of the country this would be illogical, counter-productive and quite unacceptable.

8. Poll Tax

A “poll tax” would be theoretically “efficient” but practically very difficult and politically unacceptable.

9. Government Funding of Devolved Functions

This is the “unfunded mandate” whereby central govt has passed to local govt new responsibilities without giving them the money to fulfil them. To us it seems a no-brainer that central government should be told not devolve functions without allocating corresponding funding.

10. Removal of Rating Exemptions for Churches, Schools, Hospitals etc

Although we were initially attracted to this especially in order to create a level playing field, we have concluded this exemption is socially desirable. Churches, schools etc (including local incorporated societies, clubs etc) are an integral part of our social fabric and many would collapse if forced to pay rates (or similar). The people belonging/participating will already be paying (mostly) via their household rates (or income tax) and institutions such as schools and hospitals do pay for certain services used (eg water and sewage).

11. Government Grants in lieu of Rates

In principle, and in the interests of a level playing field, we are inclined towards this approach for conservation and other Crown lands. But what exactly is involved and who would determine the grants structure and formulae? Might it simply invite further bureaucratisation?

12. Exemption of Maori Land not in Economic Use or Housing

This is an issue which we are not familiar enough with to have formed any firm views at this stage.

1. More Flexible Use of Current Revenue Mechanisms

1. Lift Cap on Uniform Annual General Charge

PCC levies only 16% from its UAGC ($300 per household), whereas most councils get up to 30% of their revenue this way – and many are wanting the level raised. If property-based rates must continue we urge that at the very least the UAGC be increased since it would reduce the amount of our rates which are exposed to the wild rises in market valuations. We have some paranoid sceptics complain raising the UAGC would disadvantage the poor, but we doubt that: how many ratepayers pay less than $600 a year in rates? Doubling – or even trebling - the uniform charge would still make it lower than the total rates now paid by almost all ratepayers.

2. Increased Use of Development Contribution

We really do not know enough for and against this possible option to comment with any assurance.

3. Choice of Alternative Rating Base

We do not (or not yet) have a firm conclusion on whether rates should be based on unimproved value, capital value or assessed rental value. Rather we reiterate that we are opposed to all methods of property-based taxation for unrelated services.

4. Balance Sheet Management

We understand the argument that, unlike private households, government agencies should consider “inter-generational equity” and that is can therefore be seen as desirable to raise long-term loans for many capital projects providing benefits over many decades. However, like most Kiwis, we remain quite risk averse and would be reluctant to increase substantially local government debt ratios.

5. Greater Use of Targeted Rates

Probably not, but we don’t yet know enough about this option.

6. Increased Government Funding Assistance for Roading etc

Central government currently pays councils 50-60% of local roading costs. Councils don’t want to ask for more because it would reduce their “autonomy”; ie their vested interests! Do we residents and ratepayers give a toss about such petty politics? Here in Plimmerton we have St Andrew’s Rd and Gray’s Rd owned and maintained by central government (because they are State highways), while all other Plimmerton streets are owned and maintained by Council (with a government contribution). What difference does that make to us? Why shouldn’t we ask for central government to contribute more to the construction and maintenance of all roads – paid for from our existing petrol tax (which is what it is intended for).
This option goes well beyond roading to other types of infrastructure. We believe it applies most aptly to the services now provided by the (relatively new) regional councils. We consider regional councils are an unnecessary extra level of bureaucracy and that most of their services and functions could be more “efficiently” provided by central government; eg transport, biosecurity, emergency management, environment and pollution control, flood protection, navigational safety, land management, parks and forests, water “wholesaling” etc.

1. Reducing Impacts of Current Revenue Mechanism

1. Differential to Smooth Impact of High-Value Residential Properties

2. Valuation Averaging

Both of the above evoke the image of a frog in slowly heated water: it’s slow and painless, but it still kills you. The same argument also applies to other superficial alleviation measures, such as the Sacramento model whereby rates are frozen at a particular level after so many years of ownership or after valuation has doubled.
There should be ongoing efforts to reduce government expenditure: the size of government should not increase faster than population and relative expenses should be constant (demographic distortions excepted).

3. Enhance Take-Up of Rates Rebates

While these might be well-intentioned, we believe they are misguided since they simply try to make the ugly face of inequitable rates less horrible. They are also demeaning. Since we are determined to have property rates abolished altogether, we are not willing to do anything which might facilitate their continued existence.

4. Rates Postponement

This measure is better than home equity release mortgages, but only just. It might be called a decent contingency arrangement for impoverished senior citizens, if really necessary. But surely unrealised capital gains are ugly and unfair even if you do get a rebate or postponement?

1. Cost Containment

1. Performance Improvement/Measurement

Another “no brainer” – of course this should be done! Benchmarking between Councils could be challenging owing to individual differences, but requiring all Councils to be reviewed separately according to Baldridge criteria (for example) could be beneficial.

2. Amalgamation

We think this needs studying. There is a potential loss of local democracy. But “shared services” at least could be good (eg PCC shares an after-hours call service with Palmerston North, or somewhere, for mutual economies – surely there are many other possibilities for sharing too?) This broad issue also relates to that of regional coordination so that each and every tin-pot council in a single region doesn’t go ahead with its own multi-court netball centre etc.
How can we continue to justify such huge operating costs nationwide with a population of just 4 million? Have the members of the EU lost their individuality and democracy as a result of shared currency and regulations for example? The argument against mergers often seems made to preserve the status quo. Just how many policy analysts does this country need?
Why can’t we have fewer and slimmer local bodies operating more like businesses and less like political, paternalistic “power and control” circuses? Their actual structure and modus operandi now seem outmoded  on top of all the revenue issues. The 42% of all Porirua rates that is spent on upholding the functioning of Council itself seems unacceptable and hugely wasteful. There just has to be a better way. 

3. Review of Requirement to Fund Depreciation

There seem to be strong arguments forthcoming that Councils shouldn’t have to fund depreciation (as required since 1996 unless Councils decide it is prudent not to do so). We are provisionally inclined to agree with this consensus, but would like to study this further.(Tim Sheppard)
For Plimmerton Residents’ Association Inc.

re-appontment

The ceo of the Porirua City Council has been reappointed for a further 4 year term.

You read it first on the Porirua Wellington Web Blog
Wednesday, March 7, 2007

COUNCIL MEDIA RELEASE - MORE SPIN THAN THE SPACE SHUTTLE - THERE IS A JOB OF WORK TO BE DONE AND IT IS NOT EASY

Fax: (04) 237 1405 Tel: (04) 237 5089

DR BLAKELEY RE-APPOINTED CEO AT PORIRUA CITY

Porirua City Mayor Jenny Brash said she was delighted to announce that Dr Roger Blakeley’s contract as Chief Executive has been extended for a further four years. The decision was taken during the public excluded section of last night’s Council meeting.

Dr Blakeley was first appointed Chief Executive in November 2000.

His position was re-advertised recently at the end of the current term. This is a requirement of the Local Government Act 2002.

“We have a lot of challenges ahead,” said Mayor Brash, and “Council looks forward to working with Dr Blakeley on the implementation of the Long Term Council Community Plan; the new Sports and Events Centre, Village Planning projects, the revitalisation of the City Centre, review of Council budget processes and cost structures, and a number of other projects including work on the harbour, Inlet and catchments, the Takapuwahia stormwater upgrade, the rolling review of the District Plan, heritage management, the walkways and cycleways strategy and asset management.

“Porirua City is on a roll.

“The just completed BERL Regional Performance report shows Porirua City at the top of all 73 local authorities for GDP growth. We were also third equal in the recently completed Quality of Life report across 12 of the countries largest cities.

“These are very good indicators but we know we cannot rest on our laurels as there is considerable work ahead to ensure Council delivers its services efficiently and effectively.”

sports and events procedures - useful discussion

CEO'S ANSWER TO THE MESSAGE BELOW


Graeme     

ORIGINAL MESSAGE


From: Graeme Ebbett <ebbett.automation@clear.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:41:22 +1300
To: Roger Blakeley <rblakeley@pcc.govt.nz>
Cc: Gary Simpson <gsimpson@pcc.govt.nz>, Jenny Brash <mayor@pcc.govt.nz>
Bcc: Graeme <gebbett@buzz.net.nz>
Subject: PCC Council Meeting 7 March 2007 - S&E Centre - Why The Indecent
Haste? And Without Normal Process?

The CEO PCC

Dear Dr Blakeley

If management is well organised and the intention is to keep the public on
side, then one would expect the next progress-report and
officer-recommendation on the S&E Centre project to go to the relevant
committee for consideration, then for its recommendation to go to the full
Council for a decision.

That would be the proper procedure for engagement of the public and the
opportunity for consultation.

What possible reason can there be to bypass the committee and  ram a
decision directly through Council tomorrow night?
(And ignore the SFR committee which met only a week ago).

In the last conversation  (meeting PCC Officers/RA Representatives 23/11/06)
my understanding was that officers were going to make the project design
drawings (incl building sketch and overall site plan) publicly available
prior to Council deciding to proceed with invitations to tender.
That was an obvious step to ensure that the rating-paying public saw what
they were going to get before the decision was made by their elected
representatives.

Tomorrow night councillors are required to decide to proceed with tenders.
Yet drawings are not yet available!
(Earliest date available for viewing 30th March).

A decision is to be made to relocate the skatepark and
FURTHER REDUCE THE SIZE OF TE RAUPARAHA PARK.
Yet NO SITE PLAN is available to show the overall  impact of that reduction.

"It will also be necessary to REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF TREES on the
south western section of Te Rauparaha Park".
Yet there is no aspect sketch to show the resultant big grey wall which will
confront Titahi Bay Rd.

It is my concern that the public would undoubtedly have a great deal to say
about the destruction of this only city- centre green-space and the loss of
venue for such events as the annual Festival of the Elements and Christmas
in the Park.

By bypassing due process officers are denying people the opportunity to even
know about it, until it is too late.

Is that the intention?

May we please address the Council meeting re the subject above.


Graeme Ebbett
Chairman
Titahi Bay Residents Assn Inc
C/- 37 Terrace Rd, Titahi Bay, Porirua.
Work Ph 568 6377, Fx 568 2374
Home Ph 236 8574, Fx 236 8591
Email ebbett.automation@clear.net.nz

village strategy money

A very important meeting was held last night. The purpose of the meeting was to work towards decisions on the projects to be funded next year from the Village Strategy fund. All the residents' associations were present (except Whitby) and the chief executive chaired the meeting.

The meeting demonstrates:

local government funding review

Ratepayers vent spleen at public meeting 5:00AM Tuesday February 27, 2007 By Simon O'Rourke     The New Zealand Herald An independent panel carrying out a Government inquiry into local body rates moves to Auckland today smarting from criticism that the timing of hearings prevents many ratepayers from airing their views. About 50 people turned up to the first meeting, in Hamilton yesterday, to vent their anger, opinions and theoretical solutions over the spiralling rates bills being imposed by territorial authorities throughout New Zealand.

But, from the outset, panel chairman David Shand was grilled with questions about the short notice of the public meeting and why it was being held during work hours. "If this is a serious meeting it should have been better publicised," said resident Joe Simpson. "I rang the local council this morning, and they said they were not sure who you [the rates inquiry panel] were or where you were."

Another person interjected: "Just look around. There's only about 30 or 40 people here and most of them are senior citizens. It's an absolute disgrace. There's been inadequate advertising. This issue has been bugging Hamiltonians for many years. This inadequate campaign is beyond comprehension." Mr Shand admitted there was a limited advertising budget, but said the meeting had been notified on radio and in the newspapers.

The issue of evening meetings would be looked into if it was found the daylight hours were inappropriate, he said.

A number of issues were raised by Hamilton ratepayers yesterday. John Gibson of Grey Power said he was concerned about the councils' way of collecting rates by way of capital valuations.

"Particularly in the urban areas where values rise steeply at each valuation." Cash-poor elderly people were being forced to sell their homes because of increased valuations that were leading to higher rates they could not afford.

"It's quite unjust if these people are forced to move from properties where they are mentally and physically comfortable because they cannot meet the rates demands." Hamilton ratepayer Tiare Waaka-Timoti said borrowing to fund inappropriate projects was a big part of the problem. "City councils are getting into more debt, and eventually they'll make us pay for it." Non-profit organisations such as churches and schools should be treated no differently from anyone else, Mr Waaka-Timoti said, and should be forced to pay rates.

Russelle Knaap, who owns properties in different districts, said her biggest gripe was with central government and her local "empire-building" regional council, Environment Waikato. The burden of national projects, such as the clean-up of Lake Taupo, was being "shunted on" to local areas that were hundreds of kilometres away, she said.

Hamilton rates activist Moira Johnson referred to 67 different pieces of Government legislation that local bodies were expected to implement, without any financial help from those who were writing the new laws.

Compliance costs were out of control, she said. Environment Waikato had provided information that recently introduced laws would cost it an estimated $7 million to implement. Despite her requests, Hamilton City Council had refused to give Ms Johnson an estimation of the costs it expected to bear due to the new laws.

"The drivers [of increasing council expenditure] are the huge demands on council," she said. "Public expectations have soared with little regard to costs and who will be paying." Former Hamilton mayor David Braithwaite addressed the meeting as another concerned ratepayer. He criticised the way councils were being run and said the answer was not raising more money, but spending it more wisely. Local authorities would be crucified if they had to operate in a world of commercial realities, he said.

"The city council is involved in all sorts of things it should not be involved in, from airports to hotels." An audience member retorted with the comment "and stadiums," referring to Mr Braithwaite's past leadership role in building Waikato Stadium. Many in the audience encouraged introduction of a "user pays system" for large council projects. Mr Simpson said councils needed to get "back to basics" and provide only essential services.

i am asked about the protection of views - a top priority for the DP suburban re-work, in my humble opinion

plimmerton residents' association

The Association's meeting was efficiently chaired by John Lambe last night. Usual raft of items, with a strong emphasis on the need to reform the District Plan. In the context of its Annual Plan deliberations, the Council needs to consider greater priority for this work. Crs Gillon, Murrell and Shaw tried to explain the Council to the bemused citizens. r Tuesday, February 27, 2007

survey method

Questions are being asked about the method of the survey reported earlier in the blog. This survey was professionally conducted. Provided a sample is absolutely random the sample size can be quite small. However, samples are seldom random and it is sensible to gather some more information on the method. r Sunday, February 25, 2007

COUNCIL ADVISES

Sampling & Method Summary for Quality of Life Survey 2006
All interviewing was conducted by TNS New Zealand (market research company).
The Electoral Roll was used to randomly select names from the 12 territorial
authorities.  A survey letter was sent to potential households advising them
of the survey.  Telephone interviewing occurred July - November 2006.  The
average interview length was 20 minutes and final response rate was 22% (the
same as the 2004 Survey).  Approximately 500 interviews were conducted in
each of the "twelve cities/districts" (total 6,215).  An additional 1,505
interviews were conducted for a dataset forming the "Rest of New Zealand",
for a total sample of 7,720.
 
a) Local data
For each of the "12 cities/districts", quotas were used to assist with
representation of all groups.  Then, because the actual number of interviews
achieved (eg Porirua =  531; Auckland = 501) did not exactly match the
population for each location aged 15 years or over, weighting was required
once interviewing was complete, to ensure an exact match with the respective
population distribution by gender, age and ethnicity.
 
b) National data
To analyse the complete dataset of the 12 cities/districts, each of the
totals was weighted to fairly reflect the city/district size in relation to
the 2001 Census, so each city/district reduced or increased accordingly (eg
Porirua from 531 to 91; Auckland from 501 to 770).  This process does not
affect the robustness of the Porirua data - the Porirua report and analysis
was conducted on the full 531 interviews completed.  A further point is that
there are two large "national level" datasets: "Total 12 Cities" and "Rest
of New Zealand", allowing us to determine any major points of difference
between urban populations and the rest of New Zealand.  The total NZ dataset
combines "Total 12 Cities" and "Rest of New Zealand" and is weighted to
reflect the relative proportion of the NZ population 15 years and over.  The
2006 Summary for Porirua, available on Council's website (
<http://www.pcc.govt.nz/GetImage.aspx?ImageID=9664d4bc-41dd-4ed7-a335-237fca
1cc118> Porirua Quality of Life Report 2006 Summary (47KB pdf)) compares our
results with the combined national dataset.   The results for Porirua will
continue to be analysed to determine other trends.
 
I hope this is helpful - please see the full descriptions of methodology and
sampling in any of the city/district reports or the national report (esp
separate pdf chapter "Research Design") on the Big Cities website
<http://www.bigcities.govt.nz> http://www.bigcities.govt.nz

festival of the elements

I was asked two questions: why did the dignitaries sit behind a white picket fence away from the real people? and what did the Festival cost?

getting married has not slowed bonallack

In previous blogs there has been comment that Andrew Bonallack writes the Porirua Edition of "City Life" pretty much single handed. This week he has 11 stories and some good photographs. He ought to stand for the mayoralty. r Thursday, February 22, 2007

someone likes the council, evidently (survey results)

Understanding of Council Decision-Making Process The proportion of residents surveyed who felt they understood how Porirua City Council made decisions was 5% above the national average.

Confidence in Council Decision-Making Just under half of Porirua residents surveyed agreed they had confidence that the Council made decisions in the best interests of the City, above the national average.

so cost is not stopping our people from going to the doctor

Usage of General Practitioners Just under a quarter of those Porirua residents surveyed reported that, in the preceding 12 months, there had been at least one instance when they had wanted to visit a doctor but had not done so – slightly higher than the national average.  Cost was the dominant reason identified by Porirua residents who had not visited their GP when they had wanted to although this level was lower than the national average.

mixed result for porirua city in the quality of life survey

Quality of Life Website:

www.bigcities.govt.nz

COUNCIL PR MACHINE VIEW:

QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY GIVES PORIRUA THUMBS UP

92% of Porirua residents rated their quality of life positively and 93% viewed their

health favourably, according to a recent national survey.

The biennial Quality of Life survey measures the perceptions of over 7500 residents

living in New Zealand's 12 largest cities and districts. In Porirua, 531 residents were

interviewed.

81% of these believe that Porirua has a culturally rich and diverse arts scene and this

perception was 17% higher than the national average.

Porirua City Deputy Mayor Euon Murrell says it is pleasing to see us ranking better

than the national average in many aspects of the survey.

"We also have a stronger sense of community in Porirua compared with the national

average and 97% of those surveyed said they had positive contacts with their

neighbours. We also rate positively our cultural diversity with 64% saying it made

living in Porirua a better place. This was 10% higher than the national average.

"But our sense of pride in the city has dropped by 12% since 2004 with just over half

of our residents agreeing they felt pride in the city. This is 6% below the national

average and shows we still have some work to do. Those who lacked pride believe

more needs doing to smarten the city's appearance - that it looked dirty or drab and

that graffiti and vandalism let it down."

However, most Porirua residents felt safe in their homes and neighbourhoods after

dark and these results were better, or on a par with, national averages.

Deputy Mayor Murrell says other results include a greater use of public transport in

Porirua and more people working and studying full-time than the national average.

"The survey produces a large amount of data, over 1600 pages, and these top line

results still need to be further analysed. What is good is that the data is gathered by

ward, gender, age, income and ethnicity, so we as a Council will be able to burrow

down and identify issues of significance where further work is needed."

The survey will also be a big contributor to Council's Porirua City Wellbeing Report

2007, which will report on our progress toward the Community Outcomes in our

Long Term Plan." 

judgeford hills subdivision

The Council divides the City into zones to ensure rational development in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Then, when someone wants to do something different they apply for a Plan Change, to override the established zones. The Council itself began this line of action with the Aotea Block. Now we have an application for the Judgeford Hills Subdivision. This creates a whole new suburb for our City in one easy action. What is more it can have its own set of special rules (like the Aotea example, which has terrible rules). My question is, why do we bother with zones anyway if we are going to sprout new rules whenever a developer seeks to make money out of a piece of land?

The plan is to have 40 lots in five clusters, to reduce the visual impact, avoid potential wetlands, etc. It will be contiguous with the Bradey Road subdivision to the north.

The Council has engaged a consultant team to process this project, Connell Wagner. The costs all go home to the developer because this is a private plan change application. r Saturday, February 17, 2007

what we are learning

Whilst dissatisfaction with Council continues - and will peak with this being election year - it is opportune to reflect on the progress of the last year.

The most vital work of the last year has been the internal reform of the Council. We had reached a point in the functioning of the Council that decisions were not being made, the directions to officers were being changed from meeting-to-meeting, there was low officer morale, and councillors were occupied in nothing more than personal fights. The Council looked pretty foolish in the newspapers and there was no strategic direction. Public dissatisfaction with Council reached new heights as the Long Term Council Community Plan was set.

The reforms have provided a system which enables decisions to be made. There is now the ability to adhere to a direction of development. It is possible to track progress. Having gotten it right at the core of the governance business, the Council is for the first time able to address other things.

The second most significant thing the Council did was participate in the Transmission Gully decision. The key to this was the decision to vote $200,000 to enable us to hire experts to speak down the experts hired by Transit and others. We had credible people undermine each of the important ideas that supported the Coastal Highway plan. The result obtained needed this wing and it needed the sustained effort of community groups and individuals. The council and the community sides of the exercise worked well together.

In the Transmission Gully exercise we learnt much about new methods of engagement with the public. These lessons have carried over into the rates enquiry work and there will be other similar applications.

From the Long Term Council Community Plan exercise there came important learning's. At a retreat the councillors and officers devised a totally new approach to the budget process. Greater insight was brought to what was required and how the new Act of Parliament may be made to work. There is a long way to go with this reform of process, but we are on the path.

The third significant development is the new approach to the development of the District Plan. We have now devised a process to advance changes to of our District Plan. It is in strong contrast to the traditional method. The traditional method is to wait to the end of the statutory period and then have one massive review of everything as quickly as possible. Council's around the country do this. We are now seeking to examine our objectives and rules within the District Plan in an evolutionary way.

The result is that we have a chance of getting ahead of the developments and stresses that loom as urbanisation intensifies. We have a long way to go. But, we are on a road at last. This is a road that enables the community to come together each year to determine priorities for the District Plan work. In this area there are very distinct points-of-view. The professional town planners and landscape architects have views that are often quite different from those of the community. Yet when the community and these professionals come together the result can be inspired. In our process we seek that outcome. Again, we have a long way to go, but we are at last on the road.

I am more comfortable with the progress of Council in the last short period than in any of the 15 or so years that I have been involved. As an extra excitement, it is probably true to say that already we are leading New Zealand councils with regard to the mechanics of Council.

Comments on these thoughts would be most welcome.

r Saturday, February 17, 2007

whitby association agm

Invitation to Whitby Residents’ Association AGM

The WRA is holding its public AGM on Wednesday 14 March 2007 in St Mary’s Church, Whitby (By the Whitby Library), starting at 7.30pm

After the usual business matters – short officers reports and election of the committee, The Hon Winnie Laban MP has agreed to address us. Her speech is likely to start at about 8.00pm.

Following that we intend to discuss development of a Whitby Village Plan, Council’s performance and policies, then moving onto preparations and timetable in the run up to Local Body elections.

All members of the Council are welcome to attend but we particularly direct this invitation towards our Mayor and Northern Ward Councillors.

The date for this meeting has been scheduled for some months and it unfortunately clashes with a Council meeting. However, we hope you can join us for our AGM at least in time to hear Winnie Laban speak.

Jim Dearsly

Chairperson WRA Committee

underclass

OPINION – Litea Ah Hoi    Porirua City Councillor A feature in “Porirua City Life”   15 February 2007

John Key's speech regarding "the underclass" has caused quite a stir. What does it mean and who is he referring to? The unemployed? Those living in a low socio-economic area? Those whose children attend or have attended decile one schools? Families with an income of $25k?

My gosh. I've been living a lie all these years. There I was, raising four kids, unemployed, working part-time, living in Cannons Creek, kids attending decile one schools, thinking I had all the riches I needed, not realising I was poor, let alone an "underclass".

Hey, I was happy.

People get tired of being labelled, placed in social groups. For some, it becomes so embedded; it's the only thing they know. Yes, address social problems like poor parenting skills, welfare dependency and youth gang violence, but stop labelling.

Mr Key touched on an issue of providing food in low-decile schools for kids in need. While I concur with Mr Key on this one, to a point, I firmly believe that many Pacific and Maori families on benefits or low income have no excuse for not feeding or clothing their children.

I agree, there are children going to school hungry, damn. I've seen it. I've also seen children going to school without shoes or jackets on rainy days.

The issue isn't about whether or not they have enough money to feed and clothe their kids. It's about management and pri­oritising where their money is spent. You can buy a loaf of bread for $1, a packet of cereal for $2, Vegemite for $2, mince or lamb chops for $10, shoes for $20.

Where does the weekly benefit or wage go? Entertainment ... like pokies, housie, TAB, alcohol, drugs. They will find $40 for housie, $20 for pokies, $20 for a dozen, $20 for a tinny, but when it comes to finding $10 for the school trip, they struggle.

Get your priorities right. Saturday, February 17, 2007

business growth in our City

BUSINESS PORIRUA WELCOMES STRONG GROWTH IN THE PORIRUA ECONOMY

Business Porirua, the Chamber and Economic Development Agency for Porirua, yesterday welcomed the latest findings from BERL’s survey of local council economic performance.

BERL, the leading and most consistent economic forecasters in NZ, undertake an annual survey that compares the performance of all Territorial Local Authority areas across 4 key indicators - population growth, employment growth, GDP growth and business unit growth.

In 2004 Porirua City took 36th position out of 73.  In 2005 this improved to 29th but in 2006 it jumped to 13th.  This in itself hides a very strong performance in GDP growth and employment growth.  Against these two counts Porirua scored 1st and 2nd out of all local authority areas.  In terms of GDP the City’s growth at 13% exceeded that of the next best performing area (Horowhenua) by 30%.

David Graham, President of the Porirua Chamber commented “This is a great result for Porirua City.  Those of us who run businesses in Porirua City see the improved performance in our daily takings and growth in business turnover, but to find that Porirua City is one of the top performing economies in the Country is wonderful news.  It highlights what we have been saying for a long time that the Porirua City is well positioned and has a firm foundation and range of businesses to take advantage of emerging business opportunities both in NZ and increasingly overseas.”

The Executive Director of Business Porirua Mark Copsey said, “We are seeing increased confidence from business surveys we have undertaken and our regular networking events.  This is highlighting a range of growth related issues that businesses now face in terms of funding growth, recruitment and retention of staff, managing and managing growth.  These are all good signs in local commercial property such as Northpoint, Plimmerton along with continued strong demand for retail space.  We are responding to these issues by organising a range of business training and information sessions designed to assist companies to sustain their growth and development.  We are also seeing an increased interest in our activities and events from Wellington based corporate advisers looking to develop client base in the Porirua City.  This shows that the advances made in the Porirua City are being noted.”

“Porirua City still has to address a number of issues in terms of the range of business accommodation as there is a shortage of quality office based accommodation as has been highlighted in the work done for Porirua City Council on its future urban design.  However, the fact that this is an issue reflects the growth that has taken place and the increased interest in Porirua City, these are positive.  We look forward to working with the City Council and the private sector so that we can sustain this performance over the next 12 months and beyond.” Saturday, February 17, 2007

who is doing what

These tables relate to the motions moved and carried last year. This information assists when the question is asked: are councillors contributing to the decision-making of Council. When someone moves a motion they speak to it first. Hence, it is those who want to talk who often jump in first.

This is a taste of the data that I am collecting to gain views on the quality of Council's decision-making. This table is one measure of participation in the meetings that I chaired last year. Below is the same data for the other major committee of the Council.

r Friday, February 16, 2007

distant blog reader

Hello from the Philippines! My name is Jenny Locsin and I am from the Philippines.  I am working on my second degree course in nursing and will soon graduate by March, this year with a Bachelor's Degree in Nursing.  I will then take the local boards and see the possibilities of working as a nurse in your beautiful city, Porirua.  My first course is Accountancy. For me to be able to work there, I need to go through an assessment training in Whiteria Polytechnic.  My goal is to pursue my dream of becoming a nurse and live in your city.  I see pictures of your place and i have fallen in love with it. Your site is full of information that helped me a lot.  Keep up the good work! Sincerely, Jenny Locsin Tuesday, February 13, 2007

whitby developments- reserves & walkways

Whitby residents will benefit from recent decisions of the Porirua City Council. Prominent among them are moves to develop more walkways and improve access to regenerating native bush.

The initiatives in, and around, Whitby include:

The money for some of this work comes from the Staithes Drive Development Limited subdivision. That will produce for Council about $475,000 in development levies. Ratepayers will also contribute to the work. The current balance of the account that funds such work is $1.2 million (excluding the new levies). Developers must contribute to city infrastructure and community assets to serve their developments. They do this when they pay development levies. Porirua City residents demand high standards for their City. This reflects in the quality of the green areas and amenities throughout our suburbs. It also reflects in the level of levies paid by developers. r Saturday, February 10, 2007

ambitions for the development framework

Porirua Development framework is a strategic plan to guide the long term physical development of the city. This pan will be completed this year and is a critical first step to the development of the District Plan.

This work  will define the physical footprint that Porirua City's urban areas should ideally evolve around. This means it sets the zones for the City.

We have to set out the goals and obectives for the suburban and rural zones. This is contentious.I want to see the guiding principles tightened in favour of a very specific vision for our City.

We want our suburbs to provide for human dwelling in a natural setting. This is consistent with the values of New Zealanders and it contributes to the mental health of residents. The physical health benefits that come from lifestyles that involve a relationship to natural areas and physical exercise are also important. All the evidence says that our people need space, peace, and green surrounds. I hope that such ideas are the basis of our re-development of the District Plan. The rules in the District Plan must do more than settle disputes - they must build an outstanding environment in which we can live successfully.

More on this topic shortly. r Saturday, February 10, 2007

funny what you read in election year - how, exactly, do we save $5 million a year?

MINUTES  OF  EXECUTIVE  COMMITTEE  MEETING HELD ON Tuesday  19 December 2006 AT THE PAREMATA BOATING CLUB STARTING AT 8 PM

APOLOGIES:   Russell Morrison, Geoff Neil, Pat Brocklehurst, Derek Robinson

PRESENT:   Richard Chelley (chair), Dougal Cable, Christine Torbitt, Lynne Harding, Grace Osvald, Judi Doornbos, Crs John Green and Euon Murrell.

ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Nominated, seconded and elected by acclamation: -

MINUTES LAST MEETING The minutes of the last meeting as circulated were accepted as a true and correct record. Richard Chelley/Dougal CableNO MATTERS ARISINGFINANCIAL REPORT: Due to the absence of the treasurer there was no financial report.  The secretary advised that over $1000 in subscriptions and donations had been received so far.

CORRESPONDENCE:

In

Inwards received and outwards endorsed: Judi Doornbos/Richard Chelley

WESTERN CORRIDOR: Transmission Gully has been included in the Draft Wellington Regional Transport Strategy, copies of which have been received.  The meeting was advised that it is imperative that those in favour of TG make submissions to that effect and to actively encourage anyone they knew to do the same to counter balance submissions against TG from those still actively working towards a Coastal Highway.  Numbers count !  A précis of the Report will be available (and distributed to members of the committee) approx mid January to assist with submissions.

TRANSIT’S REVIEW OF SH1 UPGRADE (INCLUDING T2 LANES) Transit invited the PCC, representatives from Paremata and Plimmerton Residents Assn and the Coastal Highway Group (!) to a presentation of their Review of the ‘Works’ (upgrade SH1) including the T2 lanes.  Transit undertook this review without regard to promises made to the Environment Court nor the required consultation and was an ill disguised further step towards their goal to permanently 4-lane Mana Esplanade. The CEO of PCC advised Transit that PCC was not prepared to accept the Review. It was agreed that a new Review would be done by Transit and PCC together, sharing the cost, with different consultants (acceptable to both parties) who would take account of the requirements of the Environment Court and include consultation with residents.

UPDATE LIGHTS/CROSSING MARINA VIEW Transit’s Review included looking at the necessity of traffic lights at Marina View and found that it did not qualify under the ‘warrants’.  It appears that matters such as ease/safety of entering and exiting properties on the western side nor the impact on businesses in Bridgepoint was taken into account.

SPORTS/EVENT CENTRE Cr Euon Murrell advised that representatives of the Residents Associations and Councillors had met and that an assurance had been given that the cost of the Centre would not rise above $17M.  The consultants’ brief is to design the centre within that limit.  Cr Murrell had some hope that the government may be persuaded to contribute to the Centre. Questions were raised about the way the whole matter had been handled and that the perception is that the Centre is predominantly for two sports of little interest to most residents in our area.  Most of this area children’s sporting activities are catered for at venues other than the Rec Centre. Cr Murrell undertook to get the statistics of the number of Northern Ward youngsters using the Recreation Centre. The matter of high rates was raised and the usual explanation that in comparison with other cities Porirua had a small business sector and therefore the burden of rates impacted disproportionally on residents. This led to the question whether Porirua was in fact a viable entity. Cr Green queried the high cost of Porirua’s bureaucracy. He considered this cost could be reduced by up to $5M per year.

VISUALISATION: The need for yet another consultants report on a possible upgrade of the ‘city centre’ was queried.  Cr Murrell said it was part of the LTCCP and no money for following any ‘ideas’ through had been budgeted.  It was suggested by members of the committee that continually titivating the city centre to try attract people to the city centre for anything other than shopping was a waste of money as the ambience could never match that of their own area.   GENERAL BUSINESS: Judi reported that she had run into Ian Barlow and told him we were looking for someone to look into a village plan for Paremata and that he had expressed an interest.

MEETING CLOSED AT 9.30 PMDATE NEXT MEETING:   Tentatively 23 January 2007.

plimmerton's tag

Editor I waited for someone to challenge the press release issued by Jenny Brash regarding Plimmerton’s 75-year-old tag vandal. Nothing appeared, yet her naïve and disingenuous comments require an answer.

There are four important points. The first is that this is not a tag incident. It is a dispute between neighbours that produced one stupid action. Tagging requires more sustained activity and publicly directed activity.

The second point is that when in her press release Ms Brash said we have to treat all those who tag the same, she failed to take account of a fine feature of our justice system - which is that we have regard to all the facts in individual cases. We do not aspire to blind justice in New Zealand. Age, motive, and other circumstances are relevant in the decisions about offenders.

The third point is one that should cause the mayor to reflect. The source of the frustration that produced the action is in some part a Council responsibility. I hasten to add that no one supports the deed itself - but what drove an elderly person to do a silly thing should concern us. It should concern us in the same way that we are concerned about the causes of juvenile offending.

In this case, developments next door drove someone to distraction. There was not an adequate mechanism in place to have the dispute resolved. There was not the possibility of amelioration. Our rules of town planning did not work.

This is not an isolated incident - it is common for neighbours to discover enhancements they do not like. Equally, those who develop their properties within the rules have the expectation that all is well. They do not seek to upset anyone, they stick to the rules, and they expect to maintain good relationships with their neighbours. 

Such situations should concern us in the context of its reform of the District Plan. Indeed, the need to consult with neighbours in certain circumstances is one of the things on a long list of possible reforms of our planning rules.

Finally, it is not the mayor’s job to sit in judgement on citizens. Nor to use our money to issue press releases about her decisions. The worse when she is wrong. The mayor owes the gentleman an apology.

Robert Shaw Porirua City Councillor

SUPPORTING POINT

Excellent letter, but here is a situation where an elderly gentleman is vilified over a single transgression, while others who tag the town constantly if under 10 years are not subject to criminal liability. If under 14 cannot be charged with any offence except murder or manslaughter. Both in these categories cannot be named. The latter group cannot claim provocation as can Roger. Name of writer not for publicaton.

regional economic strategy advances - porirua helped to facilitate this decision

property values

Wellington:

district plan process

rates processing problem being fixed

survey outcome - comments invited

contacts as requested

guess this proves jenny is standing for the mayoralty again

COUNCIL MEDIA RELEASE: BAD EXAMPLE TO YOUNG PEOPLE

Tagging in Porirua City will not be tolerated, no matter who the taggers are or their age, says Mayor Jenny Brash.

“There has been recent publicity about the tagging of a house in Plimmerton and the involvement of a well known elderly resident.

“Let me make it clear that tagging is the deliberate destruction of private or public property and is against the law. It should not and will not be tolerated.

“If people are concerned about an issue or issues, then there are correct and proper ways of raising their concerns. They should not take the law into their own hands.”

Ms Brash said she was especially concerned about the message this particular incident would send to the young people of Porirua City.

“Tagging costs our community and other communities, hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to repair.

“I would urge the person involved in this particular incident to think through his actions and seek a solution to his concerns through other means.”

................................................................................................................................. For further media inquiries, please phone Roger Foley on 0275 303381 in the first instance.

top issues survey continues - results soon

mayoral candidates so far

Declared are:

Jenny Brash

Liz Kelly

Northern Ward, so I hear informally, is the current lot plus former councillor Nick Legget. I expect at least two new ones who are at this moment keeping silent. People will miss out.

Also, informally, I hear that the Labour Party in the form of the local leaders (Taima and Bud) expect to announce a Labour mayoral candidate within two weeks. We shall see. r Thursday, January 25, 2007

mana esplanade review - draft tor

DRAFT

REVIEW OF PAREMATA-PLIMMERTON UPGRADE (INCLUDING MANA T2 LANES AND ST ANDREWS ROAD)

Terms of Reference

Introduction

When the Environment Court approved the designation for the T2 Lanes along Mana Esplanade and St Andrews road a requirement was that a review of operation, environmental effects, safety and efficiency be carried out.

The relevant sections of the “Transit New Zealand “Urban Section” Designation: restrictions, terms and conditions”  are:

43C     Transit will, within one year of commissioning the work, undertake surveys to assess the side road and pedestrian delays at Marina View intersection and any relevant issues concerning vehicle access difficulties for properties south of Pascoe Avenue.  In consultation with Paremata Residents Association Incorporated, Transit shall investigate the necessity for modifications to the form and operation of the intersection and consider whether further surveys and investigation should be undertaken.

Review of designation

Transit and Porirua City Council have agreed to jointly fund an independent review of the Paremata – Plimmerton Upgrade.  (Greater Wellington and Land Transport New Zealand will be engaged with Transit and PCC in agreeing the Terms of Reference)

Objectives

The review is to provide an objective assessment of the operation, environmental and social effects, safety and efficiency of the review of Paremata - Plimmerton upgrade (including Mana T2 lanes and St Andrews Road) and the need for any improvements to the current operational practices.  The review is also to consider whether or not to seek any alteration to the designation in relation to the operation, environmental effects safety and efficiency of the work.    

The review is to identify the issues and recommend mitigation measures.

In considering these issues the review is to take account of:

Scope

The review is to cover the area from immediately south of the Paremata roundabout to immediately north of the Plimmerton roundabout.  This specifically includes St Andrews Road, Mana Esplanade, the two large and one small roundabouts, and the modifications to State Highway 58 that were included in the project.

The review is to include consultation as described below.

The review is to address the issues raised during the consultation, and the issues already raised by residents and others, listed in Appendix 1

Issues of perceptions of individuals and the resulting behaviours are to be included in the investigation  (for example, residents report that they do not park in the T2 lanes between peak periods, because they fear that their car may be hit by another vehicle. There are few accidents to support this fear, but the perception is enough to cause an “effect”.  Conversely, some motorist have an expectation that the full four lanes should be operating normally, and treat the road accordingly – Mark to supply words)   The review is to analyse the issue raised and to investigate mitigation and remedial measures to address the problems.  Note that remedial measure need to be practical, achievable and affordable.

The review is then to make recommendations of actions to be taken to achieve the level of effects from the road outlined by the Environment Court requirements.  Background to this is the evidence presented by Transit NZ at the Environment Court.

A list of background documents that are to be considered in the review is included in Appendix 2.

Consultation

The review is to include consultation with, but not limited to, the following people and organizations to identify any issues associated with the operation, environmental effects, safety and efficiency of the complete State Highway reduced upgrade, including problems arising from the T2 Lanes and mitigation of these problems:

Porirua City Council Greater Wellington Regional Council Paremata Residents’ Association Inc. Plimmerton Residents’ Association Inc. Ngati Toa Runanga Transit New Zealand Individual residents living along the State Highway Owners of businesses along the State Highway Automobile Association Coastal Highway Group Transmission Gully Action Group Road Transport Association New Zealand Police

The consultation is to involve a written invitation to provide written feedback and an offer to meet and accept oral feedback from individuals and groups.  This may eventuate in public meetings with associations and groups.

Previous work

Transit New Zealand commissioned a “Review of Paremata- Plimmerton Upgrade (including Mana T2 Lanes)”, and this resulted in a report dated November 2006.  This review considered traffic and safety issues, and the data on these issues will be used as background for the current review.

The report went on to assess options, draw conclusions and make recommendations.  These did not take into consideration any consultation with residents, road users or any other interested parties.

Expertise

It is expected that the consultant’s team will have expertise in conducting community surveys and analysing data and that the consultation will raise issues that require expert knowledge of the environment, road safety, social issues, noise, traffic (including pedestrians and cyclists), community functioning, and interpretation of Environment Court conditions.

Programme

It is expected to be able to commission the consultant to undertake this work  in early March 2007.    The draft report is to be provided by the end of June 2007.  The client is to be provided with four weeks to consider this draft report with a further week to be provided to the consultant for finalisation of the report.  An earlier completion is preferable, if this is practical.

A suggested programme follows:

from Australia's paper "The Age" - we should be very pleased with this win-win

"The exporter community can be broken down by market destination for goods as well. New Zealand was top of the pops, with 17,394 Australian businesses having exported to the Shaky Isles in 2005-06. This indicates that many exporters actually find exporting "across the ditch" relatively easy and that Kiwiland is a good nursery to start with when learning the craft of exporting. The CER, now more than two decades old, really gave Australian companies — especially small businesses — a kickstart into exporting."

http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/exporters-seize-their-opportunities/2007/01/19/1169095978960.html

extract from better democracy nz

local observation of comet

norman rumsey

I have just returned from the funeral of Norman Rumsey. His work founded an industry in Porirua City. His inventions are within light system all round the world. Norm was once in charge of the optics section within DSIR. He was one of New Zealand's foremost scientists.

How typical of a scientists funeral. The fact that he was a world authority in his field and that his theoretical optics is the basis of a large part of the discipline of optics does not seem to have spoiled anyone. It is said he has inspired the next generation of optical designers. The importance of optical design today is not something we often reflect upon. Perhaps we should.

One of Norm's first projects was the design of a light system for Porirua harbour. First, the outer harbour and then the inner harbour. The problem was that the normal system of having two lights that would line up could not be implemented in Porirua. Norm's design of an alternative is now used throughout the world. It was the basis of a local industry, Vega Industries Limited.

I quote from their websitehttp://www.vega.co.nz:

Norm was recognised in 2004 as an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit for his services to optics and astronomy. He also has an asteroid named after him.